Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 23;53(2):557–566. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02735-14

TABLE 2.

Accuracy of MAC- and GAC-ELISA with use of VLP or sNS1 antigens

Target panelb Antigen(s) AUC (95% CI) % discriminatory probability (95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity
MAC-ELISA
    DENV DENV-2 and -3 VLP 0.990 (0.960–0.999) 95.95 (88.6–99.2) 100 (95.8–100)
DENV-2 and -3 NS1 0.976 (0.939–0.994) 89.19 (79.8–95.2) 95.35 (88.5–98.7)
    JEVa JEV VLP 0.944 (0.885–0.978) 100.0 (79.2–100.0) 88.9 (81.0–94.3)
JEV NS1 0.944 (0.885–0.978) 100.0 (79.2–100.0) 88.9 (81.0–94.3)
    WNVa WNV VLP 0.945 (0.896–0.976) 92.8 (85.7–97.0) 96.2 (87.0–99.4)
GAC-ELISA
    DENV DENV-2 and -3 VLP 0.937 (0.887–0.969) 82.43 (71.8–90.3) 90.7 (82.5–95.9)
DENV-2 and -3 NS1 0.936 (0.887–0.969) 85.14 (75.0–92.3) 88.37 (79.7–94.3)
    JEVa JEV VLP 0.933 (0.871–0.971) 93.7 (69.7–99.0) 92.9 (86.0–97.1)
JEV NS1 0.980 (0.934–0.997) 100.0 (79.2–100.0) 96.0 (90.0–98.9)
    WNVa WNV VLP 0.713 (0.634–0.784) 46.4 (36.2–56.8) 96.2 (87.0–99.4)
WNV NS1 0.673 (0.591–0.747) 40.2 (30.4–50.7) 94.3 (84.3–98.8)
a

Same protocol as DENV NS1-ELISA of using JEV- or WNV-VLP for depletion of prM/E antibodies and JEV- or WNV-NS1 for NS1-MAC/GAC-ELISA.

b

Control panels were other serocomplex panels and negative panels.