Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 5;135(9):2085–2095. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28862

Table 2.

Genes selected from the “before IR” and “after IR” analysis

Selected genes from “before”/“after” analysis
BCAN CTSA PDCD1
Before IR After IR Before IR After IR Before IR After IR
Normal 30% 14% 35%
Good response 64% 39% 52% 34% 52% 39%
Poor Response 78% 71% 73% 60% 63% 54%
p-Value 0.230 0.016 0.041 0.041 0.062 0.023
LTC4S BNIPL FGFBP2
Before IR After IR Before IR After IR Before IR After IR
Normal 36% 55% 19%
Good response 56% 41% 37% 57% 24% 41%
Poor Response 71% 63% 31% 43% 19% 28%
p-Value 0.023 0.033 0.398 0.183 0.477 0.213
IL5RA PCK1 TPRG1
Before IR After IR Before IR After IR Before IR After IR
Normal 54% 40% 34%
Good response 34% 49% 27% 43% 35% 52%
Poor Response 19% 32% 16% 24% 29% 41%
p-Value 0.023 0.083 0.109 0.026 0.423 0.327
RB1 H2AFY GYPE
Before IR After IR Before IR After IR Before IR After IR
Normal 75% 18% 57%
Good response 82% 76% 60% 40% 52% 65%
Poor Response 86% 81% 76% 61% 40% 50%
p-Value 0.035 0.118 0.037 0.076 0.056 0.021

The table shows the percentage of methylation in three groups (poor and good responders in addition to normal controls). The p-value was calculated by using a Mann–Whitney U-test comparing two categories (good response to poor response) both before and after IR. Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) are highlighted with bold letters.