Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Econ Behav Organ. 2014 Dec 19;110:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.014

Table 6. Difference GMM estimations of sm. participation of British sub-groups in the US by sex.

Both parents born in UK Only father born in UK Only mother born in UK
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Males
 Culture 0.542 [0.213]* 0.335 [0.167]* 0.552 [0.204]* 0.202 [0.092]* 0.097 [0.049]*
 Lagged sm. participation 0.869 [0.416]* 0.892 [0.349]* 0.900 [0.307]* 0.969 [0.025]* 0.934 [0.020]*
 Person-year observations 10019 10019 10059 15608 31165
 No. of persons/Instruments 314/16 314/14 314/15 545/72 1015/152
 Hansen test (for lagged instruments) 8.2 (0.613) 8.8 (0.361) 6.9 (0.643) 72.0 (0.287) 129.1 (0.840)
 Difference-in-Hansen test (for independent variables) 5.1 (0.403) 4.8 (0.437) 3.0 (0.701) 5.1 (0.404) 5.1 (0.410)
Females
 Culture 0.376 [0.188]* 0.168 [0.163] 0.442 [0.174]* 0.0012 [0.054] 0.173 [0.087]*
 Lagged sm. participation 0.9013 [0.120]* 0.931 [0.098]* 0.9433 [0.433]* 0.976 [0.072]* 0.918 [0.026]*
 Person-year observations 11267 11267 11340 15983 31767
 No. of persons/Instruments 359/14 359/18 359/17 542/74 1025/122
 Hansen test (for lagged instruments) 10.7 (0.222) 14.6 (0.264) 11.0 (0.444) 79.0 (0.169) 122.3 (0.327)
 Difference-in-Hansen test (for independent variables) 7.4 (0.190) 8.6 (0.125) 6.0 (0.309) 5.0 (0.417) 9.1 (0.107)

Notes: In specification (1) culture is calculated as a mean of male and female cohorts; in (2) and (4) it corresponds to that of male cohorts; and in (3) and (5) it corresponds to that of female cohorts. Because for British with both parents born in the UK the sample size is relatively small, we have collapsed the instruments to avoid over-fitting (i.e. we have allowed one instrument per lag distance, rather than one instrument per time period and lag distance). All other information, as for Table 5.