Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 21;21(3):935–943. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.935

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival of hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients included in this study

Variable n Univariate analysis
Multivariateanalyses
1-yr 5-yr P value HR 95%CI P value
Gender 0.205 NA NA NA
Female 19 66% 23%
Male 66 58% 10%
Age 0.769 NA NA NA
≤ 60 59 64% 13%
> 60 26 50% 12%
Capsule formation 0.522 NA NA NA
Yes 32 55% 10%
No 53 63% 14%
Cirrhosis 0.002 1.981 1.197-3.278 0.008
Yes 48 56% 0%
No 37 65% 27%
Child-Pugh class 0.257 NA NA NA
A 76 61% 14%
B 9 18% 0%
AFP (ng/mL) 0.342 NA NA NA
≤ 20 48 51% 11%
> 20 37 72% 15%
CA19-9 (U/mL) 0.342 NA NA NA
≤ 37 55 66% 14%
> 37 30 50% 10%
Gross type 0.402 NA NA NA
MF 63 61% 13%
PI + IG 22 56% 11%
Differentiation 0.119 NA NA NA
Well or Moderate 63 64% 16%
Poor 22 50% 0%
Tumor number < 0.001 2.653 1.562-4.508 < 0.001
Single 60 69% 17%
Multiple 25 38% 0%
Tumor size 0.006 NA NA NA
< 5 cm 43 70% 21%
≥ 5 cm 42 49% 5%
LN metastasis 0.005 NA NA NA
Yes 11 31% 0%
No 74 64% 14%
Vascular invasion 0.013 NA NA NA
Yes 11 24% 0%
No 74 64% 14%
TNM classification < 0.001 NA NA NA
Stage I or II 61 66% 17%
Stage III or IV 24 43% 0%
Width of resection margin 0.274 NA NA NA
< 1 cm 37 69% 17%
≥ 1 cm 48 53% 9%
Surgical procedure 0.962 NA NA NA
Major hepatectomy 40 61% 13%
Minor hepatectomy 45 59% 12%

AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; CA19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; MF: Mass-forming; PI: Periductal infiltrating; IG: Intraductal growth; TNM: Tumor-node-metastasis; NA: Not available; HR: Hazard ratio; LN: Lymph node.