Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 4;185(2):291–316. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2014.913586

Table 6. Regression results for school divisions 1–3, comparing FDK to HDK students.

   Odds ratios (95% CI) Estimate of meandifference
Grade 3reading Grade 3numeracy Grade 7math Grade 7engagement Grade 8read/write Grade 9index
Regression results for school divisions 1 and 2
Income quintile 1, FDK vs. HDK 1.01 (0.52, 1.98) 1.09 (0.53, 2.23) 2.47 (1.22, 5.02) 1.05 (0.57, 1.94) 0.84 (0.46, 1.56) 0.14 (−0.22, 0.49)
Income quintile 2, FDK vs. HDK 1.62 (0.84, 3.14) 1.53 (0.79, 2.98) 1.63 (0.89, 2.99) 0.97 (0.59,1.59) 0.80 (0.51, 1.26) −0.21 (−0.49, 0.07)
Income quintile 3, FDK vs. HDK 1.09 (0.55, 2.19) 2.53 (1.29, 4.95) 1.88 (0.99, 3.61) 1.38 (0.80, 2.38) 0.77 (0.44, 1.32) −0.26 (−0.65, 0.12)a
Income quintiles 4 and 5, FDK vs. HDK 0.89 (0.41, 1.93) 1.14 (0.51, 2.54) 1.42 (0.74, 2.73) 0.53 (0.28, 0.99) 0.58 (0.32, 1.07)  
Males FDK vs. HDK 0.88 (0.51, 1.52) 1.45 (0.85, 2.49) 1.47 (0.87, 2.50) 0.86 (0.55, 1.34) 0.64 (0.42, 0.997) −0.08 (−0.36, 0.19)
Females FDK vs. HDK 1.45 (0.81, 2.58) 1.50 (0.84, 2.70) 2.23 (1.29, 3.87) 1.01 (0.66, 1.55) 0.85 (0.57, 1.27) −0.14 (−0.43, 0.15)
Regression results for school division 3
Income quintile 1, FDK vs. HDK     0.73 (0.15, 3.61)b 3.99 (0.85, 18.75)b 1.52 (0.31, 7.30) 0.24 (−0.19, 0.67)
Income quintile 2, FDK vs. HDK         0.58 (0.18, 1.90) −0.04 (−0.42, 0.34)
Income quintile 3, FDK vs. HDK         1.67 (0.58, 4.82) −0.14 (−0.49, 0.21)
Income quintile 4, FDK vs. HDK     0.41 (0.10, 1.74) 1.61 (0.44, 5.85) 0.73 (0.34, 1.58) 0.10 (−0.18, 0.38)
Income quintile 5, FDK vs. HDK     0.83 (0.20, 3.42) 1.56 (0.41, 5.92) 0.80 (0.36, 1.74) −0.08 (−0.41, 0.26)
Males FDK vs. HDK     0.55 (0.15, 2.06) 1.32 (0.39, 4.51) 0.73 (0.33, 1.65) −0.06 (−0.33, 0.22)
Females FDK vs. HDK     0.72 (0.19, 2.69) 3.53 (1.10, 11.32) 1.28 (0.59, 2.77) 0.02 (−0.25, 0.28)

Bolded values indicate statistically significant differences between FDK and HDK.

aIncome quintiles 3–5 combined.

bIncome quintiles 1–3 combined.