Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 15;36(2):449–462. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22639

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Approach behavior during the AAC task. A +4 indicates the subjects moved the avatar all the way towards the NI and/or reward points. Approach behavior significantly differed between task conditions [F(4,56) = 60.75, P < 0.001). Post hoc tests revealed that approach behavior during conflict (2, 4, and 6‐point trials) significantly differed from avoid‐threat [t(14) = −8.60, P < 0.001] and approach‐reward [t(14) = 5.454, P < 0.001] conditions and that approach behavior during conflict increased significantly from 2‐point to 4‐point conditions [t(14) = −2.455, P = 0.028] but not from 4‐point to 6‐point conditions [t(14) = −0.833, P = 0.419].