Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 21.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Jan 11;63(6):1027–1037. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.11.025

Table 3.

Studies Comparing Surrogate Measures of Volume Management in CAPD and APD

Study (Year) Study Design Setting Data Source N (CAPD, APD) F/U Outcome
de Fijter et al19 (1994) RCT Netherlands (1988–1991) Single center 82 (41, 41) 24 mo No difference in MAP or mean dry weight over time; antihypertensive drugs used in 60% of CAPD and 74% of APD
Bro et al22 (1999) RCT Denmark (1995–1999) Multicenter 34 (17, 17) 6 mo No episodes of weight > 2 kg above dry weight in CAPD group; 2 cases in APD group; mean SBP similar in both groups
Frankenfield et al34 (1999) Retrospective study US (1995–1997) Multicenter ~1,200 (~700, ~500) 3 different 2-mo periods No significant difference in proportion of individuals with hypertension
Ortega et al39 (2001) Prospective cohort study Spain (2001) Single center 36 (16, 20) 24 h (Na balance studies) In CAPD, daily peritoneal Na removal and net ultrafiltration volume significantly higher and SBP lower
Rodriguez-Carmona & Fontan40 (2002) Baseline cross-sectional data and prospective cohort study Spain (2002) 141 (63, 78); 32 before and after change from CAPD to APD 3 mo, 24-h collections for Na balance In CAPD, Na removal significantly greater, independent of ultrafiltration volume; Na removal decreased significantly after switching from CAPD to APD
Rodriguez-Carmona et al26 (2004) Prospective cohort study Spain (1998–2002) Single center 104 (53, 51) 12–24 mo In APD, ultrafiltration and Na removal rates consistently and significantly lower; in CAPD, better SBP control
Bavbek et al41 (2007) Cross-sectional study Turkey (2007) 2 centers 62 (32, 30) In APD, significantly lower daily ultrafiltration volume, higher serum brain natriuretic peptide, and LVM index; no significant difference in BP
Davison et al42 (2009) Cross-sectional study Canada (2004–2006) Single center 158 (90, 68) No significant difference in Na removal, ultrafiltration, or BP between groups; liberal use of icodextrin, limited no. of nocturnal exchanges and supplemental daytime exchange in APD group
Van Biesen et al43 (2011) Cross-sectional study Europe (NR) Multicenter 661 (53% APD) Excluded those without access to icodextrin; PD modality not associated with extracellular volume excessa
Cnossen et al44 (2012) Cross-sectional study Netherlands (NR) Multicenter 44 (24, 20) ~21–30 mo In APD, lower total Na removal; no statistically significant difference in SBP, ultrafiltration volumes, or brain natriuretic peptide ultrafiltration

Abbreviations: APD, automated peritoneal dialysis; BP, blood pressure; CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; F/U, follow-up; LVM, left ventricular mass; MAP, mean arterial pressure; Na, sodium; NR, not reported; PD, peritoneal dialysis; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

a

As measured by bioimpedance.