Table 1.

Associations between performances on the SEBT and global strategy variables derived from CoMgl in a single model*

Group	Reaching direction	Lower limb	Global strategy variables (global CoM in vertical plane)	Model adjusted R2	p value	β	Partial correlationa
Healthy group	AM	Dominant	Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s) b	0.68	0.012	0.71	-
		Non dominant	Displacement (cm) c	0.46	0.044	0.60	-
	M	Dominant	Displacement (cm)	0.81	0.004	0.80	-
		Non dominant		0.63	0.039	0.54	-
	PM	Dominant	Displacement (cm)	0.77	0.003	0.71	0.86
			Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s)		0.014	0.52	0.78
		Non dominant	Displacement (cm)	0.81	0.002	0.94	-
LAS group	AM	Uninjured	Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s)	0.68	0.019	0.66	-
		Injured	Displacement (cm)	0.85	0.049	0.45	0.67
			Peak-to-peak velocity (cm/s)		0.023	0.55	0.74
	M	Uninjured	Displacement (cm)	0.78	0.022	0.59	-
		Injured		0.45	0.023	0.72	-
	PM	Uninjured	Displacement (cm)	0.74	0.007	0.71	-
		Injured		0.54	0.009	0.81	-

*Only significant combination of variables are shown.

^aCalculated when two strategy variables were retained.

^bGlobal CoM vertical velocity (Peak-to-peak value).

^cGlobal CoM lowering (Maximum value).