Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;2(1):60–72. doi: 10.1177/1947603510380902

Table 6.

Postoperative MRI Assessment of Grafts for the Accelerated (Acc) and Traditional (Trad) Rehabilitation Groups

Variable MRI Composite Score Signal Intensity Graft Infill Border Integration Surface Contour Structure Subchondral Lamina Subchondral Bone Effusion
Acc (3 mo) 2.81 (0.10) 1.90 (0.11) 2.97 (0.16) 2.77 (0.19) 2.90 (0.15) 3.40 (0.18) 3.20 (0.14) 2.97 (0.14) 3.73 (0.10)
Trad (3 mo) 2.80 (0.10) 2.22 (0.10) 2.80 (0.16) 2.66 (0.18) 2.81 (0.15) 3.53 (0.17) 3.34 (0.14) 2.75 (0.14) 3.50 (0.10)
Acc (12 mo) 3.21 (0.13) 2.93 (0.17) 3.48 (0.16) 2.90 (0.19) 2.80 (0.18) 3.33 (0.19) 3.80 (0.07) 2.97 (0.15) 3.87 (0.08)
Trad (12 mo) 3.15 (0.12) 2.94 (0.17) 3.30 (0.16) 2.84 (0.19) 2.81 (0.17) 3.41 (0.18) 3.81 (0.07) 2.91 (0.14) 3.69 (0.08)
Acc (24 mo) 3.14 (0.12) 2.76 (0.14) 3.40 (0.17) 2.93 (0.21) 2.97 (0.20) 3.30 (0.19) 3.90 (0.05) 2.43 (0.19) 3.67 (0.10)
Trad (24 mo) 3.07 (0.11) 2.81 (0.13) 3.30 (0.16) 2.75 (0.20) 2.72 (0.19) 3.22 (0.18) 3.97 (0.05) 2.75 (0.18) 3.56 (0.09)
Time effect (P value) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.113 0.902 0.095 <0.0001 0.018 0.035
Group effect (P value) 0.740 0.435 0.462 0.659 0.610 0.861 0.423 0.937 0.102
Interaction Effect (P value) 0.796 0.279 0.878 0.733 0.515 0.508 0.728 0.096 0.661

Note: Scoring of the 8 individual MRI parameters and calculation of the MRI composite score (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = excellent), in comparison with the adjacent native cartilage. Shown are means (SE).