Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;2(1):60–72. doi: 10.1177/1947603510380902

Table 7.

Percentage of Patients within the Accelerated (Acc) and Traditional (Trad) Rehabilitation Groups Who Scored Good to Excellent (Good-Excellent) and Poor to Fair (Poor-Fair) for Each of the 8 Individual MRI Scoring Parameters, at the 3-, 12-, and 24-Month Assessment Time Points

Group Rating Graft Infill Signal Intensity Border Integration Surface Contour Structure Subchondral Lamina Subchondral Bone Effusion
Acc (3 months) Good-excellent 74% (n = 25) 9% (n = 3) 68% (n = 23) 82% (n = 28) 79% (n = 27) 71% (n = 24) 71% (n = 24) 97% (n = 33)
Poor-fair 26% (n = 9) 91% (n = 31) 32% (n = 11) 18% (n = 6) 21% (n = 7) 29% (n = 10) 29% (n = 10) 3% (n = 1)
Trad (3 months) Good-excellent 62% (n = 21) 18% (n = 6) 68% (n = 23) 79% (n = 27) 85% (n = 29) 91% (n = 31) 59% (n = 20) 97% (n = 34)
Poor-fair 38% (n = 14) 82% (n = 29) 32% (n = 12) 21% (n = 8) 15% (n = 6) 9% (n = 4) 41% (n = 15) 3% (n = 1)
Acc (12 months) Good-excellent 88% (n = 30) 62% (n = 21) 71% (n = 24) 68% (n = 23) 85% (n = 29) 100% (n = 34) 74% (n = 25) 100% (n = 34)
Poor-fair 12% (n = 4) 38% (n = 13) 29% (n = 10) 32% (n = 11) 15% (n = 5) 0% (n = 0) 26% (n = 9) 0% (n = 0)
Trad (12 months) Good-excellent 88% (n = 30) 68% (n = 23) 71% (n = 24) 74% (n = 25) 85% (n = 29) 100% (n = 35) 68% (n = 23) 100% (n = 35)
Poor-fair 12% (n = 5) 32% (n = 12) 29% (n = 11) 26% (n = 10) 15% (n = 6) 0% (n = 0) 32% (n = 12) 0% (n = 0)
Acc (24 months) Good-excellent 91% (n = 31) 71% (n = 24) 76% (n = 6) 76% (n = 26) 85% (n = 29) 100% (n = 34) 74% (n = 25) 97% (n = 33)
Poor-fair 9% (n = 3) 29% (n = 10) 24% (n = 8) 24% (n = 8) 15% (n = 6) 0% (n = 0) 26% (n = 9) 3% (n = 1)
Trad (24 mo) Good-excellent 85% (n = 29) 71% (n = 24) 68% (n = 23) 74% (n = 25) 88% (n = 30) 100% (n = 35) 71% (n = 24) 100% (n = 35)
Poor-fair 15% (n = 6) 29% (n = 11) 32% (n = 12) 26% (n = 10) 12% (n = 5) 0% (n = 0) 29% (n = 11) 0% (n = 0)