Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 21;6:5. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00005

Table 4.

The validation of bra-miR168a-1 and braAGO1 expression in tissues of heat-shock-stressed B. rapa parental plants and untreated progeny.

Tissue log2FC TR vs. CT, bra-miR168a-1 expression, sequencing q-value, sequencing Normalized log2FC TR vs. CT, bra-miR168a-1 expression, Northern Blot log2FC TR vs. CT braAGO1 expression, sequencing q-value, sequencing log2FC TR vs. CT braAGO1 expression, qPCR p-value, TR vs. CT, qPCR
Leaves 0.58 1 3.15 −0.08 1 0.74* 2.13E-02
Inflorescence meristem 0.05 1 −0.07 0.41 1 0.69* 6.00E-04
Pollen 1.19* 0.04 0.36 0.64 1 1.08* 2.01E-04
Unfertilized ovules −0.54 1 −0.21 −0.08 1 −0.81* 5.04E-03
Fertilized ovules −0.62 1 0.64 −0.04 1 0.70* 1.26E-04
Embryo 0.61 1 2.50 −0.77* 1.29E-02 −0.60* 4.12E-03
Endosperm 3.42* 0.41 1.16 −1.56* 1.36E-04 −0.81* 1.23E-03
Progeny −0.58* 0.93 −1.12 0.06 1 0.57* 2.03E-02
Correlation, braAGO1 expression vs. bra-miR168a-1, sequencing data Pearson's r = −0.66

The asterisks denote a significant difference in the expression as compared to controls (the Benjamini-Hochberg method, q < 0.2 and the Student's t-test, P < 0.05 for sequencing and qPCR data, respectively). Log2FC—estimated log2 value of fold change for treated plants vs. controls.