Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 1;7:e101–e108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.09.001

Table 3.

Cage motion results for pedicle/screw rod and anterior-lateral plate specimens with endplate fracture during interbody cage placement

Endplate fracture location and level Lateral cage translation (mm)

F/E LB AR



A-P M-L I-S A-P M-L I-S A-P M-L I-S
Pedicle screw/rod Inferior endplate at L4-L5 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.5 3.3 1.2 1.0
*PSR groupavg.(StDev)

n = 17 levels
0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.2
(0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.4) (0.3) (0.1)
Lateral plate/screw
  AInferior endplate at L3-L4 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.2 0.5 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.2
  Inferior endplate at L4-L5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3
  Superior endplate at L4-L5 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 2.1 2.1 1.5 0.5
  BInferior endplate at L3-L4 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.2
*ALP groupavg.(StDev)

n = 14 levels
0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.4
(0.2) (0.1) (0.4) (0.1) (0.4) (0.2) (1.0) (0.3) (0.4)

Abbreviations: avg., average; StDev, standard deviation. Lateral cage translations were measured during cyclic loading along theanterior-posterior (A-P), medial-lateral (M-L), and inferior-superior (I-S) axes for each loading mode.

*

Average cage translations for the respective treatments (PSR and ALP) inspecimens with intact endplates.