Table 3.
LG | QTL [cM] | 95% CI | Length of CI | Marker | LOD | Additive (SE) | Dominance (SE) | % variance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body size | ||||||||
2 | 176.5 | 161.6 – 185.6 | 24.0 | scaffold01446_1050 | 5.2 | 0.050 (0.010) | 0.011 (0.015) | 11.7 |
3 | 72.0 | 61.5 – 96.6 | 35.1 | contig23286_629 | 5.4 | 0.054 (0.011) | -0.006 (0.015) | 12.0 |
6 | 11.1 | 5.1 – 74.3 | 69.2 | contig28688_84 | 4.0 | -0.040 (0.011) | 0.027 (0.015) | 9.1 |
10 | 14.6 | 3.1 – 24.4 | 21.3 | contig53311_380 | 4.1 | 0.045 (0.011) | 0.012 (0.015) | 9.2 |
Lifetime offspring production (= fecundity) | ||||||||
1 | 7.32 | 0.8 – 12.6 | 11.8 | scaffold00772_255 | 6.6 | 23.968 (4.199) | -1.767 (6.244) | 14.6 |
3 | 124.7 | 118.9 – 139.2 | 20.3 | scaffold01201_3880 | 3.8 | -10.091 (5.075) | 18.740 (7.363) | 8.6 |
7 | 91.8 | 76.8 – 101.9 | 25.1 | scaffold01869_1276 | 4.2 | 16.472 (4.466) | -16.117 (6.400) | 9.5 |
8 | 96.4 | 86.9 – 105.7 | 18.8 | scaffold01126_2577 | 3.9 | 12.526 (4.623) | -17.220 (6.706) | 9.0 |
Difference in phototactic response | ||||||||
6 | 164.0 | 126.0 – 136.0 | 10.1 | scaffold00892_2305 | 3.6 | 0.016 (0.026) | -0.169 (0.042) | 8.2 |
For each QTL, the location (linkage group (LG) and cM location), 95% confidence interval (CI) of the QTL region, name of nearest marker, lod-score (LOD), effect size (additive and dominance) with standard error (SE) and percent phenotypic variance explained is shown.