Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014 Nov 8;79:104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.10.020

Table 4.

Tissue morphometric analysis of RBM WT and RBM HET, Sham and ACF mice.

Morphometric Analysis
RBM WT RBM HET
Sham ACF Sham ACF


n= 7 9 10 10
BW 28.1 ± 1.1 25.8 ± 0.9 26.4 ± 1 25.4 ± 0.5
LV mg 93.7 ± 2.4 112.7 ± 5.4** 87.1 ± 2.9 98.3 ± 2.1
RV mg 25.2 ± 1.4 34.1 ± 1.7** 27.2 ± 1.3 33.3 ± 1.7##
LA mg 3.8 ± 0.3 8.2 ± 0.3*** 3.7 ± 0.2 6.2 ± 0.6###,
RA mg 4.5 ± 0.3 7.6 ± 0.4*** 3.5 ± 0.3 6.4 ± 0.5###
Lung g 149.1 ± 2.8 152.3 ± 5.5 142.5 ± 4.7 147.4 ± 4.1
LV/TL 5.17 ± 0.12 6.19 ± 0.29** 4.83 ± 0.17 5.45 ± 0.11
RV/TL 1.39 ± 0.08 1.87 ± 0.09** 1.51 ± 0.08 1.84 ± 0.09#
LA/TL 0.21 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.02*** 0.21 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.03###,††
RA/TL 0.25 ± 0.02 0.42 ± 0.02*** 0.19 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.03###
Lung/TL 8.23 ± 0.16 8.35 ± 0.24 7.91 ± 0.27 8.17 ± 0.22

Significant RBM WT ACF vs. RBM WT Sham at

**

p< 0.01

***

P<0.001

RBM HET ACF vs. RBM HET Sham at

#

p< 0.05

##

p< 0.01

###

P<0.001

RBM HET ACF vs. RBM WT ACF

p<0.05

††

p<0.01.

BW: body weight; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle; LA: left atria; RA: right atria.