Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 3;15(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1057

Table 4.

Nucleotide diversity per population

Bitter Amino acid Fatty acid All Tasr
Populations* N πt ± SE πg ± SE πt ± SE πg ± SE πt ± SE πg ± SE πt ± SE πg ± SE
International 31 1.8 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0. 5 1.9 ± 0. 1 1.7 ± 0.0 1.4 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.4
Iberian 04 1.1 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0. 4 0.5 ± 0.0 0.4 ± 0. 0 0.4 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.2
Creole 14 2.7 ± 0.6 3.3 ± 0.85 1.8 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.1 2.5.0 ± 0.3 1.8 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.5
Brazilian 03 2.8 ± 0.5 3.6 ± 1. 0 2.1 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.5 2.90 ± 0.7
Asian 08 2.0 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0. 7 2.0 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.6
Asian WB 06 2.5 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.60 2.2 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.6
European WB 09 2.1 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0. 8 1.0 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.0 0.4 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.5
Total 75 2.1 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.3 2.0 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.5

Estimations are per kilobase and were calculated at total (πt) and gene region (πg) by population and gene group.

Samples from Tamworth, ‘Manchado de Jabugo’, and the two Sumatran wild boars are not included.

*P < 0.05, Significance based on 1000 permutations.