Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 22;5:7949. doi: 10.1038/srep07949

Table 2. Comparison between mitochondria-encoded genes and mitochondria-derived nuclear genes in terms of the evolutionary rate and composition bias.

  Mitochondria-encoded genes Mitochondria-derived nuclear genes
Functional categories Energy production and conversion cob, cox2, cox3, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad9 cox11, sdhB, sucD, petA, erpA, hesB, ybjS, nuoC, nuoD, nuoF, nuoG, nuoI
  Translation and posttranslational modification rpl2, rpl5, rpl6, rpl16, rps1, rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7, rps8, rps11, rps12, rps13, rps14, rps19 rpl3, grpE, groEL, dnaK, clpB, clpP, hslV, engA, gidA, trmE
  Others   AFG1, apaG, bioC, hemN, ksgA, mraW, hypothetical
Mitochondrial/Nuclear average evolutionary rate (substitution/site) *   1.713 (stdev 0.225) 1.273 (stdev 0.088)
Mitochondrial/Nuclear average aminoGC content **   0.152 (stdev 0.017) 0.215 (stdev 0.004)
Mitochondrial/Nuclear average compositional chi-square scores *   662.4 (stdev 394.3) 89.6 (stdev 41.4)

*T-test P < 0.01 ** T-test P < 0.001.