Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Resour. 2013 Mar 1;48(4):945–968. doi: 10.3368/jhr.48.4.945

Table 5.

Treatment effects on achievement z-score by low-income status using IHDP HLBW sample with ECLS-B weights

Outcome (sample size) Model
A B C
Age 8 reading (n=308) Treatment −0.116 (0.209) −0.041 (0.261) −0.456 (0.267)
Low income −0.643*** (0.156) −0.936*** (0.123)
Treatment x (low income) 0.804*** (0.184)
Age 8 Math (n=312) Treatment 0.120 (0.149) 0.187 (0.206) −0.137 (0.197)
Low income −0.594* (0.257) −0.830** (0.281)
Treatment x (low income) 0.636** (0.224)

Coefficient significance (within site correlation corrected standard errors):

*

0.10

**

0.05

***

0.01. All models also condition on child gender, birth weight, gestational age at birth, neonatal health index, and site indicators. Estimates in appendix.