Skip to main content
. 2014 May 3;3(4):1062–1074. doi: 10.1002/cam4.253

Table 2.

Patient enrollment and log (meth-index) distribution in different centers.

Normal CIN1 CIN2 CIN3/CIS SCC/AC
n Mean ± SD n Mean ± SD n Mean ± SD n Mean ± SD n Mean ± SD
PAX11
 TSGH 130 –1.9 ± 1.0 14 –1.1 ± 1.5 7 –2.2 ± 0.3 14 –0.5 ± 2.2 10 2.1 ± 2.5
 NCKUH 57 –2.0 ± 1.0 12 –2.3 ± 0.2 8 –1.4 ± 1.5 14 –0.2 ± 2.3 9 1.3 ± 2.9
 CGMH (Linkou) 50 –1.9 ± 1.2 21 –2.0 ± 1.2 5 –1.2 ± 1.7 8 0.6 ± 2.2 6 2.5 ± 0.7
 HTCMC 48 –2.0 ± 0.8 5 –1.9 ± 0.4 3 –1.1 ± 0.8 9 0.8 ± 2.3 3 3.1 ± 1.0
 CGMH (Kaohsiung) 35 –1.6 ± 1.5 17 –1.6 ± 1.3 4 –0.6 ± 1.9 12 –1.0 ± 2.0 15 3.2 ± 0.7
 NTUH 33 –1.8 ± 1.3 1 1.3 2 –2.4 ± 0.2 16 –0.5 ± 2.4 0
 MMH 31 –1.8 ± 1.7 11 –2.2 ± 1.2 4 –1.6 ± 1.7 10 –0.3 ± 2.3 2 3.7 ± 0.2
 VGH (Taichung) 17 –1.7 ± 1.5 6 –1.5 ± 1.3 1 2.8 4 0.9 ± 2.2 4 1.8 ± 2.1
 CMUH 2 –2.2 ± 0.1 0 3 –2.3 ± 0.4 1 3.7 0
 VGH (Kaohsiung) 3 –2.1 ± 0.3 0 0 2 2.1 ± 0.6 0
 VGH (Taipei) 2 –1.8 ± 1.0 0 0 1 1.6 0
 Total 408 –1.9 ± 1.2 87 –1.8 ± 1.3 37 –1.4 ± 1.5 91 –0.1 ± 2.3 49 2.5 ± 1.9
P value2 0.9498 0.0269 0.0742 0.3686 0.3090
SOX13
 TSGH 130 –0.6 ± 1.5 15 –1.4 ± 1.2 7 –0.4 ± 1.7 14 0.4 ± 1.7 10 2.8 ± 1.0
 NCKUH 57 –1.2 ± 1.3 12 –0.2 ± 1.2 8 –0.6 ± 1.3 14 0.2 ± 1.8 9 2.5 ± 0.8
 CGMH (Linkou) 50 –1.0 ± 1.5 21 –0.4 ± 1.5 5 –0.9 ± 1.6 8 1.2 ± 1.2 7 2.4 ± 0.6
 HTCMC 48 –0.8 ± 1.3 5 –0.4 ± 1.2 3 –0.6 ± 1.3 9 1.0 ± 1.7 3 2.8 ± 1.0
 CGMH (Kaohsiung) 35 –0.1 ± 1.3 17 –0.9 ± 1.5 4 –1.1 ± 1.6 12 0.2 ± 1.2 15 2.6 ± 1.0
 NTUH 33 –0.9 ± 1.6 1 –2.2 2 –2.3 ± 0.2 16 0.9 ± 1.5 0
 MMH 31 –0.5 ± 1.3 11 –0.7 ± 1.6 4 0.2 ± 1.6 10 0.3 ± 2.0 2 3.2 ± 0.5
 VGH (Taichung) 17 –0.7 ± 1.4 6 –1.0 ± 1.7 1 2.6 4 0.3 ± 1.9 4 1.7 ± 1.9
 CMUH 2 –2.2 ± 0.3 0 3 –2.3 ± 0.4 1 3.5 0
 VGH (Kaohsiung) 3 –1.6 ± 0.9 0 0 2 2.5 ± 0.3 0
 VGH (Taipei) 2 –1.8 ± 1.0 0 0 1 1.7 0
 Total 408 –0.8 ± 1.4 88 –0.7 ± 1.4 37 –0.7 ± 1.5 91 0.6 ± 1.6 50 2.5 ± 1.0
P value1 0.0206 0.3333 0.1419 0.3780 0.5948
1

Four cases without methylation data.

2

By ANOVA.

3

Two cases without methylation data.