1. Indication (at minimum screening vs. non-screening) should be measured |
2. The criteria used to classify indication should be specified, including the factors included in the algorithm and how they were assessed |
3. The perspective of indication determination should be reported (patient, referring provider, endoscopist, or chart reviewer). |
4. There should be a clearly defined gold standard to determine indication |
5. The distribution of exams by indication should be summarized |
6. Sensitivity analyses should be considered for results that might change based on indication classification |