Table 2.
P (two-way ANOVA) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | BDNF | 1NMPP1 | Age effect | Treatment effect | Interaction | |
Pt (N cm−2) | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.759 | |||
6 months | 6.1 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | |||
18 months | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | |||
24 months | 4.7 ± 0.3* | 3.9 ± 0.4* | 3.8 ± 0.4* | |||
Po (N cm−2) | <0.001 | 0.897 | 0.412 | |||
6 months | 18.8 ± 1.0 | 19.7 ± 1.1 | 19.5 ± 1.1 | |||
18 months | 18.6 ± 0.8 | 18.8 ± 0.6 | 17.5 ± 0.7 | |||
24 months | 14.7 ± 0.3* | 12.9 ± 1.0* | 14.5 ± 1.0* |
Maximal twitch force (Pt) and isometric tetanic force (Po) are normalized to physiological cross-sectional area (mean ± SEM). Data were obtained using diaphragm muscle–phrenic nerve preparations in control, or BDNF-or 1NMPP1-treated groups (n = 7–9 per group) prior to neuromuscular transmission failure testing. Diaphragm muscle contractile properties were assessed only with direct muscle stimulation and were thus independent of the data presented in Fig. 1, but were necessary to verify preparation quality and possible effects of treatment. Post hoc comparisons show both Pt and Po at 24 months significantly different from at 6 and 18 months(*) and Pt in the control is significantly different from in the 1NMPP1 treatment group.