Table 3. Intervention effects on EC use on day of clinic visit and contraceptive use 3 months latera.
| EC dispensed at visit (n=323c) OR (95% CI) | Using highly effective reversible contraception at 3 month follow up (n=238d) OR (95% CI) | Changed to a more effective contraceptive by 3 month follow upb (n=238d) OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventione (vs. Pre-intervention) | 4.66 (1.76-12.35) | 1.91 (0.94-3.90) | 2.02 (1.03-3.96) |
| Teen (vs. 20+) | 1.29 (0.70-2.38) | 1.13 (0.63-2.03) | 0.93 (0.52-1.66) |
| Non-white (vs. White) | 0.88 (0.33-2.36) | 1.93 (0.69-5.40) | 1.45 (0.59-3.59) |
| Insured (vs. not) | 1.18 (0.50-2.75) | 1.97 (0.86-4.55) | 1.08 (0.51-2.28) |
| No Method prior to visit (vs. any method prior) | 3.12 (1.65-5.88) | 0.81 (0.45-1.47) | 5.67 (3.18-10.11) |
Each column header reflects a dependent dichotomous outcome for which a multivariable logistic regression model was created with all variables shown in table rows included as independent predictor variables.
As compared to the method they used prior to seeking pregnancy testing from the study clinic.
Participants who completed surveys immediately after their clinic visit contributed data to this model from both the pre-intervention (n=95) and intervention (n=228) periods.
Participants who completed surveys 3-months after their enrollment clinic visit contributed data to this model from both the pre-intervention (n=71) and intervention (n=167) periods.
Data shown in this row reflects the odds of a change in the outcome specified by each column's header during the intervention period compared to the pre-intervention period. The comparison groups for the rows that follow are indicated in parentheses.