Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 3;59(1):104–115. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu063

Table 2.

Linear mixed-models evaluation of log endotoxin (EU m–2) and allergen (ng m–2) sampling using electrostatic dust collectors (EDCs). Model estimates and 95% confidence interval (CI) of sampling 7, 14, and 28 days are shown.

Effect N Modeled GM 95% CI Sampling period P-value Fold differences between modeled GM
Endotoxin (EU m 2)a
Day 7 30 934 604–1450 7 versus 14 2.15
Day 14 30 2010 1370–2950 <0.0001 14 versus 28 1.38
Day 28 30 2770 1850–4140 7 versus 28 2.96
Allergens (ng m 2)
Fel d1 b
Day 7 7 58.1 13.9–244 7 versus 14 1.87
Day 14 7 109 24.7–479 0.40 14 versus 28 0.87
Day 28 7 95.1 25.9–349 7 versus 28 1.64
Can f1 c
Day 7 6 276 27.7–2750 7 versus 14 2.00
Day 14 6 554 84.7–3630 0.078 14 versus 28 1.69
Day 28 6 939 147–6020 7 versus 28 3.40
Mus m1 d Day 7 7 58.7 20.4–169 7 versus 14 1.59
Day 14 7 93.5 41.3–212 0.0085 14 versus 28 2.35
Day 28 7 220 87.7–552 7 versus 28 3.75

alogEndotoxin = 3.44–0.47(Day 7) − 0.14(Day 14) + ɛ

blogCatAllergen = 1.98–0.21(Day 7) + 0.058(Day 14) + ɛ

clogDogAllergen = 2.97–0.53(Day 7) − 0.23(Day 14) + ɛ

dlogMouseAllergen = 2.34–0.57(Day 7) − 0.37(Day 14) + ɛ