Table 2.
Strategy | Implementation and impact |
---|---|
Adjusting the length of training | • Implemented locally in some specialties only in view of the funding and resources required • Positive feedback where implemented |
Redesigning rotas | • Increased anti-social working hours • Non-resident on-call has been implemented in some specialties • Trainees have opted out of the EWTD because of rota gaps in some acute care specialties |
Using operating lists dedicated to training | • Popular with trainees and trainers alike • Limited by employer productivity targets |
Setting targets for number of each procedure performed | • Patchy implementation in some specialties • Targets are limited by individual learning paces and availability of the correct patient population |
Using simulation technology for training | • Advocated by the Department of Health • Limited availability locally because of cost |
Reconfiguing services | • Hospital at Night has successfully encouraged multidisciplinary work and cross-specialty cover • Training in recognized centres only: not popular |
Including periods of supernumerary training | • In place in General Practice training programs but not generally available • Limited by resources |
Increasing consultant numbers | • Gradually under way in some acute specialties such as Obstetrics • Limited by financial constraints in NHS |
Providing adequate educational governance | • Standards set by the GMC with regular trainee questionnaires and visits to specialty training schemes • Educator roles to be encouraged and recognized |