Table 4.
Samples | MetaCluster 2.0 | BiMeta |
---|---|---|
R1 | 75.61% | 97.82% |
R2 | 80.40% | 87.19% |
R3 | 66.83% | 77.59% |
R4 | 96.42% | 98.94% |
R5 | 94.75% | 98.97% |
R6 | 95.40% | 96.09% |
R7 | 69.96% | 91.63% |
R8 | 96.74% | 97.92% |
R9 | - | 86.42% |
The symbol “-” indicates that MetaCluster 2.0 fails to perform on sample R9. BiMeta achieves higher F-measure than that of MetaCluster 2.0 for the all samples.