Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 16;10:2. doi: 10.1186/s13015-014-0030-4

Table 4.

The F-measures of MetaCluster 2.0 and BiMeta on samples from R1 to R9

Samples MetaCluster 2.0 BiMeta
R1 75.61% 97.82%
R2 80.40% 87.19%
R3 66.83% 77.59%
R4 96.42% 98.94%
R5 94.75% 98.97%
R6 95.40% 96.09%
R7 69.96% 91.63%
R8 96.74% 97.92%
R9 - 86.42%

The symbol “-” indicates that MetaCluster 2.0 fails to perform on sample R9. BiMeta achieves higher F-measure than that of MetaCluster 2.0 for the all samples.