Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):978–989. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000419

Figure 6. Group level coherograms, and coherence analyses of propofol baseline and propofol-induced unconsciousness (TM and PM).

Figure 6

A. Group level coherogram of propofol baseline showing relative absence of coherence in the delta, theta, alpha and beta frequency bands.

B. Group level coherogram of propofol-induced unconsciousness (TM), showing increased coherence in alpha/beta frequency bands.

C. Group level coherogram of propofol-induced unconsciousness (PM), showing increased coherence in slow, delta and alpha frequency bands and a decrease in slow oscillation coherence (solid arrow).

D. Coherence of propofol baseline vs. propofol-induced unconsciousness (TM). Coherence was larger for propofol-induced unconsciousness (TM) in a broad beta/gamma range at 3.9–15.1 Hz, and 17.3–25.9 Hz (P < 0.0003, TGTC).

E. Coherence of propofol baseline vs. propofol-induced unconsciousness (PM). Coherence was larger for propofol-induced unconsciousness (PM) 3.9–15.1 Hz (P < 0.0003, TGTC).

F. Coherence of propofol-induced unconsciousness (TM) vs. propofol-induced unconsciousness (PM). Coherence was larger for propofol-induced unconsciousness (PM) at 3.9–12.5 Hz (P < 0.0003, TGTC).

Median coherence presented with 95% jackknife confidence intervals. Horizontal solid black line(s) represent frequency ranges at which significant difference existed.

Hz: hertz

PM: peak max

TGTC: two group test coherence

TM: trough max

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure