Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2014 Jul 23;87(2):409–416. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.261

Table 1.

Patient demographics

Rituximab
N=25
No Rituximab
N=25
p value

Recipient Age (mean, SD) 41 ± 15 48 ± 13 0.08

Male Gender (No. patients, %) 8 (32%) 7 (28%) 1.0

Previous Txn (No. patients, %) 19 (76%) 7 (28%) 0.002
Previous Txn ≥ 3 5 (20%) 0 0.06

HLA-A;B;DR;DQ Mismatch (mean) 4.8 5.0 0.61

Repeat HLA mismatch (No. patients, %) 20 (80%) 0 0.0001

CDC CPRA1 (mean, median) 48, 50 26, 3 0.02
FCXM CPRA (mean, median) 80, 89 60, 60 0.02

Crossmatch Strength: (No. patients)
CDC+ 2 1 1.0
FCXM+ 9 11 0.77
FCXM−, DSA+ 14 13 1.0

Number of DSAs2 (mean, median) 2.0, 2.0 1.7, 1.0 0.59

Donor Age (mean, SD) 38 ± 12 46 ± 11 0.03

No. Pre-Transplant Plasmapheresis (mean) 3.7 2.3 0.08

No. Post-Transplant Plasmapheresis (mean) 4.1 3.9 0.81

anti-CD25 Induction (No. patients, %) 10 (40%) 12 (48%) 0.78

Thymoglobulin Induction (No. patients, %) 15 (60%) 13 (52%) 0.78
1

Calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) was determined for HLA-specific antibodies of sufficient strength to yield a positive cytotoxicity (CDC) or flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM).

2

Number of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) prior to desensitization.