Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 9;59(1):51–61. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu219

Table 4.

Clinical Improvement at Day 4 (Intent-to-Treat and Clinically Evaluable Analysis Sets) in Patients With Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (Excluding Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia)

Analysis Set Group Ceftobiprole
Ceftazidime/Linezolid
No. n (%) No. n (%) Difference (%)a (95% CI)b
ITT
 HAP (excluding VAP) 287 221 (77.0) 284 214 (75.4) 1.7 (−5.3 to 8.6)
 Any valid gram-positive 85 69 (81.2) 102 75 (73.5) 7.6 (−4.3 to 19.6)
 Any Staphylococcus aureus 55 45 (81.8) 76 55 (72.4) 9.4 (−4.9 to 23.8)
 Any MRSA 28 22 (78.6) 32 19 (59.4) 19.2 (−3.6 to 42.0)
Clinically evaluable
 HAP (excluding VAP) 198 172 (86.9) 185 145 (78.4) 8.5 (.9–16.1)
 Any valid gram-positive 61 53 (86.9) 69 51 (73.9) 13.0 (−.4 to 26.4)
 Any S. aureus 39 36 (92.3) 49 35 (71.4) 20.9 (5.7–36.0)
 Any MRSA 19 18 (94.7) 19 10 (52.6) 42.1 (17.5–66.7)

Clinical improvement was assessed by the investigator. All categories include monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HAP, hospital-acquired pneumonia; ITT, intent-to-treat; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; n, number of patients with clinical improvement at Day 4; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia.

a Difference for ceftobiprole minus ceftazidime/linezolid.

b Two-sided 95% CI is based on the normal approximation to the difference of the 2 proportions.