Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 9;18(6):676. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0676-9

Table 4.

Correlation coefficient, bias and limits of agreement between MLS measurement with sonography versus CT (method 2) in subgroups of patients where the pathology could adversely affect the sonographic measurement

Patient characteristics Number r 2 Bias (cm) Limits of agreement (cm)
Decompressive craniectomy 12 0.85 0.09 -0.66 – 0.48
Intracranial hematoma (SDH, EDH, IPH) 28 0.64 0.09 -1.29 – 1.11
Subcutaneous temporal hematoma 13 0.83 0.14 -1.14 – 0.87
MLS >0.5 cm 19 0.69 0.22 -1.84 – 1.39
Invasive ICP >20 mmHg 9 0.70 0.00 -0.96 – 0.96

CT, computed tomography; EDH, extradural hematoma; ICP, intracranial pressure; IPH, intraparenchymal hematoma; MLS, midline shift; SDH, subdural hematoma.