Abstract
Background
Elevated serum uric acid concentration is an independent risk factor and predictor of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether the uric acid-associated genes have an impact on T2D remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of the uric acid-associated genes on the risk of T2D as well as glucose metabolism and insulin secretion.
Method
We recruited 2,199 normal glucose tolerance subjects from the Shanghai Diabetes Study I and II and 2,999 T2D patients from the inpatient database of Shanghai Diabetes Institute. Fifteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapped in or near 11 loci (PDZK1, GCKR, LRP2, SLC2A9, ABCG2, LRRC16A, SLC17A1, SLC17A3, SLC22A11, SLC22A12 and SF1) were genotyped and serum biochemical parameters related to uric acid and T2D were determined.
Results
SF1 rs606458 showed strong association to T2D in both males and females (p = 0.034 and 0.0008). In the males, LRRC16A was associated with 2-h insulin and insulin secretion (p = 0.009 and 0.009). SLC22A11 was correlated with HOMA-B and insulin secretion (p = 0.048 and 0.029). SLC2A9 rs3775948 was associated with 2-h glucose (p = 0.043). In the females, LRP2 rs2544390 and rs1333049 showed correlations with fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and insulin secretion (p = 0.028, 0.033 and 0.052 and p = 0.034, 0.047 and 0.038, respectively). SLC2A9 rs11722228 was correlated with 2-h glucose, 2-h insulin and insulin secretion (p = 0.024, 0.049 and 0.049, respectively).
Conclusions
Our results indicated that the uric acid-associated genes have an impact on the risk of T2D, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in a Chinese population.
Introduction
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing exponentially worldwide, promoted by multifactorial genetic or environmental factors. T2D is characterised by chronic hyperglycemia caused by insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency [1]. Recent evidence has emerged from several large epidemiological studies indicating that serum uric acid levels are an independent risk factor and predictor of T2D, with a 17% increment in the risk of T2D per 1 mg/dl increase in serum uric acid levels [2]. Uric acid levels are positively associated with fasting plasma glucose [3], impaired fasting glucose [4] and 2-hour postload glucose [5]. In addition, insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion are strongly influenced by uric acid levels. Cross-sectional data from 8,144 individuals in Japan found that uric acid levels were significantly correlated with HOMA-IR [6]. In rats, the insulin resistance results of fructose-induced elevated uric acid levels could be improved using xanthine oxidase inhibitors or uricosuric agents [7]. Uric acid could cause oxidative damage and function inhibition in pancreatic β-cells through many signalling pathways, including adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) [8] and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) [9]. Additionally, glucose-induced insulin secretion was inhibited by uric acid, which further elevated serum glucose levels. In the residual β-cells in T2D patients, uric acid enhanced the ability of insulin secretion to compensate for the lack of insulin action [10, 11]. In accordance with this phenomenon, it was observed that uric acid linearly increased with increasing serum insulin levels in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. Concurrently, the enhanced residual β-cell function appears to decay more rapidly [11]. As polygenetic diseases, serum uric acid level disorders and T2D are determined by genetic factors, with up to 42% [12] and 10% heritability, respectively. Recently, the SLC2A9 gene, which encodes the solute carrier family 2 (which could serve as glucose transporter 9 and facilitate the transport of glucose, fructose, and uric acid), has been associated with T2D [13]. Additionally, the T2D-associated gene, GCKR, has been reported to be involved in regulating serum uric acid levels [14]. The interaction between uric acid-associated and T2D-associated genes is important for investigating the relationship of serum uric acid levels and the risk of T2D, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion. In this study, we selected 2,999 T2D patients and 2,199 normal glucose tolerance (NGT) subjects to explore whether uric acid-associated genes affect the T2D risk, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion.
Methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration II. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Participants
We recruited 5,198 participants, including 2,199 NGT subjects from the Shanghai Diabetes Study I and II [15, 16]and 2,999 T2D patients from the inpatient database of Shanghai Diabetes Institute predominantly with the identical genetic background (i.e., eastern Han Chinese ancestry) and residing in Shanghai or nearby regions. The NGT subjects had a negative family history of diabetes and were assessed with standard 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs). We excluded the participants with cancer, hepatic disease, renal disease or other comorbidities.
Clinical measurements
The phenotypes of the anthropometric and biochemical traits related to uric acid, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion levels were extensively evaluated in all participants. Height (m) and weight (kg) were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/height2. OGTTs were performed in the morning after an overnight fast. Blood samples were obtained at the fasting and at 2 h during the OGTTs. The plasma glucose and serum insulin were measured. Basal insulin sensitivity and beta cell function were calculated from the fasting plasma glucose and insulin using HOMA [17]. First- and second-phase insulin secretions were estimated using the glucose and insulin levels at 0 and 120 min during the OGTT and BMI measurements [18].
SNP selection, genotyping and quality control analysis
Fifteen SNPs from or near 11 loci (PDZK1 rs12129861, GCKR rs780094, LRP2 rs2544390, SLC2A9 rs11722228, rs16890979, rs3775948 and rs10489070, ABCG2 rs2231142, LRRC16A rs742132, SLC17A1 rs1183201, SLC17A3 rs1165205, rs1333049, SLC22A11 rs17300741, SLC22A12 rs506338, SF1 rs606458) were selected based on the literature and have been reported to be associated with serum uric acid levels [14, 19]. The SNPs were genotyped using a multiplex primer extension, with detection by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectroscopy with a MassARRAY Compact Analyzer (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). All 15 SNPs passed the quality control criteria with genotyping call rates greater than 90%. Individuals with more than 10% of the genotypes missing were excluded.
Statistical analysis
The continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) and were compared between the T2D and NGT study participants using Student’s t test. Before the association analysis, the T2D patients and NGT subjects performed the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. We excluded the SNPs that failed the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test (p<0.01). Tests of normality were conducted for all quantitative traits. The allelic frequencies of the diabetic patients and controls were compared using a χ2-test, and the ORs with 95% CIs are presented. The quantitative traits were analysed by linear regression using the additive model, with adjustments for age, gender and BMI using PLINK [20], and the regression coefficients ± standard error were presented, with 95% CIs. The skewed distributed quantitative traits, including the fasting and 2-h insulin levels, HOMA-B, HOMA-IR and STUMVOLL, were logarithmically transformed (log10) to approximate the univariate normality. To adjust for multiple comparisons, 10,000 permutations (using PLINK) were performed for each trait to assess the empirical p values. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS for Windows (version 8.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), unless otherwise specified. A two-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
The clinical characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The genotype frequencies of all polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Table 2 shows the analyses of the associations between these SNPs and type 2 diabetes in the males, females and all participants. GCKR rs780094 and SF1 rs606458 demonstrated associations with T2D in the females (adjusted for age and BMI, OR = 1.276, 95% CI, 1.114–1.463, p = 0.0004; OR = 1.269, 95% CI, 1.105–1.458, p = 0.0008) and in all participants (adjusted for age, BMI and sex, OR = 1.223, 95% CI, 1.111–1.346, p = 3.94E-05; OR = 1.107, 95% CI, 1.005–1.220, p = 0.038). Only rs606458 was associated with T2D in the males, after being adjusted for age and BMI (OR = 1.162, 95% CI, 1.011–1.334, p = 0.034). However, after correcting multiple comparisons with 10,000 permutations, the effects of GCKR rs780094 and SF1 rs606458 in the females (empirical p = 0.005 and 0.009) and GCKR rs780094 in all participants (empirical p = 0.0004) on T2D remained significant.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study samples.
| NGT | T2D | |
|---|---|---|
| Samples | 2199 | 2999 |
| Male/female(n) | 824(1375) | 1556(1443) |
| Age (years) | 50(39, 59) | 61(52, 71) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.086(21.171, 25.229) | 24.000(21.500, 26.420) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 120(110, 130) | 130(120, 150) |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 80(70, 80) | 80(75, 90) |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 4.600(3.900, 5.400) | 5.600(4.600, 6.900) |
| Serum creatinine (umol/L) | 63(54, 75) | 67(56, 82) |
| Uric acid (umol/L) | 282(235, 341) | 306(251, 370) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.560(3.940, 5.200) | 4.600(4.000, 5.400) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.120(0.790, 1.630) | 1.460(0.960, 2.150) |
| High-density lipoprotein cholesterol(mmol/L) | 1.350(1.140, 1.560) | 1.100(0.920, 1.320) |
| Low-density lipoprotein. cholesterol(mmol/L) | 2.840(2.350, 3.390) | 2.930(2.350, 3.530) |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.180(4.800, 5.500) | - |
| 2-h glucose (mmol/L) | 5.550(4.710, 6.400) | - |
| Fasting Insulin (mU/L) | 5.620(4.110, 7.750) | - |
| 2-h insulin (mU/L) | 19.235(11.010, 34.140) | - |
| Homa-IR | 1.207(0.874, 1.709) | - |
| Homa-B | 82.007(54.489, 126.901) | - |
| Stumvoll-First phase insulin secretion (pmol/L) | 134.216(76.685, 238.029) | - |
| Stumvoll-second phase insulin secretion (pmol/L) | 256.166(218.691, 294.651) | - |
Data are shown as median (interquartile range) or n. NGT: normal glucose tolerance. T2D: type 2 diabetes.
Table 2. Effects of SNPs from eleven uric acid associated loci on type 2 diabetes susceptibility in the Chinese population.
| Loci | SNP | Chr* | Position(bp) | Effect/Other Allele | MAF | Males | Females | ALL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P value | OR | [95% CI] | P value | OR | 95% CI | P value | ||||||
| PDZK1 | rs12129861 | 1 | 145725689 | A/G | 0.189 | 0.970 | 0.822; 1.145 | 0.722 | 1.081 | 0.914; 1.279 | 0.365 | 1.032 | 0.919; 1.160 | 0.592 |
| GCKR | rs780094 | 2 | 27741237 | G/A | 0.451 | 1.162 | 1.011; 1.334 | 0.034 | 1.276 | 1.114; 1.463 | 0.0004 | 1.223 | 1.111; 1.346 | 3.94E-05 |
| LRP2 | rs2544390 | 2 | 170204846 | T/C | 0.456 | 0.977 | 0.856; 1.115 | 0.729 | 0.959 | 0.842; 1.092 | 0.527 | 0.969 | 0.884; 1.062 | 0.501 |
| SLC2A9 | rs11722228 | 4 | 9915741 | T/C | 0.293 | 0.939 | 0.814; 1.083 | 0.386 | 1.122 | 0.968; 1.300 | 0.127 | 1.011 | 0.914; 1.119 | 0.831 |
| SLC2A9 | rs16890979 | 4 | 9922167 | T/C | 0.015 | 0.981 | 0.542; 1.773 | 0.949 | 1.059 | 0.618; 1.814 | 0.835 | 0.978 | 0.662; 1.445 | 0.911 |
| SLC2A9 | rs3775948 | 4 | 9995182 | C/G | 0.410 | 1.075 | 0.940; 1.228 | 0.291 | 0.966 | 0.844; 1.104 | 0.610 | 1.026 | 0.934; 1.126 | 0.591 |
| SLC2A9-WDR1 | rs10489070 | 4 | 10276352 | C/G | 0.138 | 0.925 | 0.765; 1.118 | 0.418 | 0.994 | 0.820; 1.206 | 0.954 | 0.959 | 0.839; 1.096 | 0.539 |
| ABCG2 | rs2231142 | 4 | 89052323 | A/C | 0.312 | 0.954 | 0.827; 1.101 | 0.519 | 0.917 | 0.793; 1.062 | 0.247 | 0.937 | 0.847; 1.037 | 0.210 |
| LRRC16A | rs742132 | 6 | 25607571 | C/T | 0.257 | 0.927 | 0.802; 1.072 | 0.308 | 1.074 | 0.921; 1.252 | 0.363 | 1.014 | 0.913; 1.126 | 0.798 |
| SLC17A1 | rs1183201 | 6 | 25823444 | T/A | 0.157 | 0.940 | 0.788; 1.122 | 0.496 | 0.996 | 0.832; 1.193 | 0.968 | 0.980 | 0.864; 1.110 | 0.746 |
| SLC17A3 | rs1165205 | 6 | 25870542 | A/T | 0.160 | 0.932 | 0.783; 1.109 | 0.426 | 1.009 | 0.845; 1.206 | 0.918 | 0.980 | 0.866; 1.109 | 0.748 |
| rs1333049 | 9 | 22125503 | C/G | 0.451 | 0.983 | 0.862; 1.121 | 0.796 | 1.054 | 0.923; 1.204 | 0.435 | 1.024 | 0.934; 1.124 | 0.609 | |
| SLC22A11 | rs17300741 | 11 | 64331462 | G/A | 0.057 | 0.992 | 0.745; 1.321 | 0.956 | 0.956 | 0.720; 1.276 | 0.772 | 0.972 | 0.795; 1.187 | 0.777 |
| SLC22A12 | rs506338 | 11 | 64440920 | C/T | 0.261 | 1.024 | 0.882; 1.189 | 0.752 | 0.990 | 0.852; 1.149 | 0.893 | 0.991 | 0.893; 1.100 | 0.867 |
| SF1 | rs606458 | 11 | 64546391 | G/A | 0.354 | 0.985 | 0.858; 1.131 | 0.829 | 1.269 | 1.105; 1.458 | 0.0008 | 1.107 | 1.005; 1.220 | 0.038 |
*Chromosome.
P values were adjusted for age, gender and BMI in all participants and were adjusted for age and BMI in both female and males. P values < 0.05 were shown in bold. Position is given for GRCh37.p13. The effect allele is the allele to which the β estimate refers.
We then analysed the effects of these SNPs on the quantitative traits in the males and females with NGT. In the males, LRRC16A rs742132 was significantly associated with the serum 2-h insulin and insulin secretion indices Stumvoll first phase insulin secretion and marginally associated with second phase (p = 0.009, 0.009 and 0.058; empirical p = 0.131, 0.126 and 0.572). SLC22A11 rs17300741 was correlated with HOMA-B and Stumvoll second phase insulin secretion (p = 0.048 and 0.029; empirical p = 0.495 and 0.348). SLC22A12 rs506338 showed significant correlation with HOAM-B (p = 0.030; empirical p = 0.347). SLC2A9 rs3775948 was shown to be associated with 2-h glucose (p = 0.043; empirical p = 0.470) (Table 3 and Table 4).
Table 3. Association between SNPs from fifteen loci and glucose and insulin levels in males with normal glucose regulation.
| Loci | SNP | Effect/Other Allele | Fasting glucose (n = 824) | 2-h glucose (n = 824) | Fasting insulin (n = 455) | 2-h insulin (n = 455) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDZK1 | rs12129861 | A/G | Beta | -0.013±0.032 | Beta | -0.053±0.070 | Beta | -0.008±0.022 | Beta | -0.021±0.031 |
| 95% CI | [-0.075;0.049] | 95% CI | [-0.191;0.084] | 95% CI | [-0.051;0.036] | 95% CI | [-0.082;0.040] | |||
| P value | 0.676 | P value | 0.447 | P value | 0.729 | P value | 0.503 | |||
| GCKR | rs780094 | G/A | Beta | 0.047±0.026 | Beta | -0.033±0.059 | Beta | -0.001±0.020 | Beta | -0.020±0.028 |
| 95% CI | [-0.004;0.098] | 95% CI | [-0.148;0.082] | 95% CI | [-0.039;0.038] | 95% CI | [-0.074;0.033] | |||
| P value | 0.069 | P value | 0.573 | P value | 0.968 | P value | 0.458 | |||
| LRP2 | rs2544390 | T/C | Beta | -0.004±0.025 | Beta | 0.013±0.056 | Beta | -0.021±0.019 | Beta | -0.004±0.027 |
| 95% CI | [-0.053;0.045] | 95% CI | [-0.097;0.123] | 95% CI | [-0.058;0.017] | 95% CI | [-0.057;0.049] | |||
| P value | 0.875 | P value | 0.815 | P value | 0.275 | P value | 0.879 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs11722228 | T/C | Beta | -0.043±0.027 | Beta | 0.047±0.060 | Beta | 0.030±0.020 | Beta | 0.047±0.028 |
| 95% CI | [-0.096;0.009] | 95% CI | [-0.070;0.164] | 95% CI | [-0.010;0.069] | 95% CI | [-0.009;0.103] | |||
| P value | 0.108 | P value | 0.427 | P value | 0.141 | P value | 0.101 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs16890979 | T/C | Beta | 0.105±0.114 | Beta | -0.205±0.255 | Beta | 0.059±0.105 | Beta | 0.034±0.149 |
| 95% CI | [-0.119;0.329] | 95% CI | [-0.705;0.296] | 95% CI | [-0.147;0.266] | 95% CI | [-0.258;0.327] | |||
| P value | 0.360 | P value | 0.424 | P value | 0.574 | P value | 0.818 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs3775948 | C/G | Beta | 0.019±0.025 | Beta | -0.114±0.056 | Beta | -0.016±0.019 | Beta | -0.013±0.027 |
| 95% CI | [-0.031;0.068] | 95% CI | [-0.225;-0.004] | 95% CI | [-0.054;0.022] | 95% CI | [-0.067;0.040] | |||
| P value | 0.462 | P value | 0.043 | P value | 0.406 | P value | 0.625 | |||
| SLC2A9-WDR1 | rs10489070 | C/G | Beta | 0.053±0.036 | Beta | -0.003±0.080 | Beta | -0.028±0.027 | Beta | -0.059±0.038 |
| 95% CI | [-0.017;0.123] | 95% CI | [-0.159;0.154] | 95% CI | [-0.081;0.026] | 95% CI | [-0.133;0.016] | |||
| P value | 0.138 | P value | 0.972 | P value | 0.309 | P value | 0.123 | |||
| ABCG2 | rs2231142 | A/C | Beta | -0.021±0.027 | Beta | 0.036±0.060 | Beta | 0.001±0.020 | Beta | 0.0004±0.029 |
| 95% CI | [-0.074;0.032] | 95% CI | [-0.082;0.154] | 95% CI | [-0.039;0.041] | 95% CI | [-0.057;0.056] | |||
| P value | 0.435 | P value | 0.550 | P value | 0.955 | P value | 0.990 | |||
| LRRC16A | rs742132 | C/T | Beta | -0.015±0.027 | Beta | -0.073±0.060 | Beta | -0.031±0.020 | Beta | -0.073±0.028 |
| 95% CI | [-0.068;0.038] | 95% CI | [-0.190;0.044] | 95% CI | [-0.070;0.008] | 95% CI | [-0.127;-0.018] | |||
| P value | 0.581 | P value | 0.224 | P value | 0.122 | P value | 0.009 | |||
| SLC17A1 | rs1183201 | T/A | Beta | 0.041±0.033 | Beta | 0.011±0.073 | Beta | 0.005±0.025 | Beta | 0.035±0.035 |
| 95% CI | [-0.023;0.106] | 95% CI | [-0.133;0.155] | 95% CI | [-0.043;0.053] | 95% CI | [-0.033;0.102] | |||
| P value | 0.212 | P value | 0.882 | P value | 0.840 | P value | 0.317 | |||
| SLC17A3 | rs1165205 | A/T | Beta | 0.051±0.032 | Beta | -0.009±0.072 | Beta | 0.003±0.024 | Beta | 0.023±0.034 |
| 95% CI | [-0.012;0.114] | 95% CI | [-0.151;0.133] | 95% CI | [-0.044;0.051] | 95% CI | [-0.045;0.090] | |||
| P value | 0.116 | P value | 0.900 | P value | 0.886 | P value | 0.511 | |||
| rs1333049 | C/G | Beta | 0.025±0.025 | Beta | 0.039±0.056 | Beta | -0.007±0.019 | Beta | -0.014±0.026 | |
| 95% CI | [-0.025;0.074] | 95% CI | [-0.070;0.149] | 95% CI | [-0.044;0.029] | 95% CI | [-0.066;0.037] | |||
| P value | 0.327 | P value | 0.480 | P value | 0.696 | P value | 0.584 | |||
| SLC22A11 | rs17300741 | G/A | Beta | -0.049±0.055 | Beta | -0.196±0.123 | Beta | 0.059±0.042 | Beta | 0.055±0.059 |
| 95% CI | [-0.157;0.059] | 95% CI | [-0.436;0.0450] | 95% CI | [-0.023;0.141] | 95% CI | [-0.061;0.171] | |||
| P value | 0.376 | P value | 0.111 | P value | 0.158 | P value | 0.354 | |||
| SLC22A12 | rs506338 | C/T | Beta | -0.029±0.029 | Beta | -0.042±0.064 | Beta | 0.031±0.022 | Beta | -0.012±0.031 |
| 95% CI | [-0.085;0.027] | 95% CI | [-0.166;0.083] | 95% CI | [-0.012;0.073] | 95% CI | [-0.072;0.048] | |||
| P value | 0.314 | P value | 0.514 | P value | 0.156 | P value | 0.700 | |||
| SF1 | rs606458 | G/A | Beta | -0.023±0.027 | Beta | -0.004±0.059 | Beta | 0.002±0.020 | Beta | -0.027±0.028 |
| 95% CI | [-0.075;0.029] | 95% CI | [-0.120;0.112] | 95% CI | [-0.037;0.041] | 95% CI | [-0.082;0.028] | |||
| P value | 0.395 | P value | 0.950 | P value | 0.914 | P value | 0.332 | |||
P values were adjusted for age and BMI. P values < 0.05 were shown in bold. Log transformed (log10) values were used for fasting and 2-h insulin levels. The effect allele is the allele to which the β estimate refers.
Table 4. Association between SNPs from fifteen loci and insulin secretion and sensitivity indices in males with normal glucose regulation.
| Loci | SNP | Effect/Other Allele | HOMA-IR (n = 455) | HOMA-B (n = 455) | Stumvoll-First phase (n = 453) | Stumvoll-second phase (n = 453) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDZK1 | rs12129861 | A/G | Beta | -0.009±0.023 | Beta | -0.006±0.026 | Beta | -0.021±0.031 | Beta | 0.005±0.009 |
| 95% CI | [-0.054;0.035] | 95% CI | [-0.056;0.045] | 95% CI | [-0.082;0.041] | 95% CI | [-0.012;0.022] | |||
| P value | 0.685 | P value | 0.830 | P value | 0.505 | P value | 0.586 | |||
| GCKR | rs780094 | G/A | Beta | 0.002±0.020 | Beta | -0.013±0.023 | Beta | -0.021±0.028 | Beta | -0.004±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.038;0.041] | 95% CI | [-0.058;0.032] | 95% CI | [-0.075;0.034] | 95% CI | [-0.019;0.011] | |||
| P value | 0.934 | P value | 0.574 | P value | 0.458 | P value | 0.622 | |||
| LRP2 | rs2544390 | T/C | Beta | -0.017±0.020 | Beta | -0.038±0.022 | Beta | -0.004±0.027 | Beta | -0.003±0.007 |
| 95% CI | [-0.055;0.021] | 95% CI | [-0.082;0.006] | 95% CI | [-0.057;0.049] | 95% CI | [-0.017;0.012] | |||
| P value | 0.387 | P value | 0.088 | P value | 0.879 | P value | 0.709 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs11722228 | T/C | Beta | 0.029±0.021 | Beta | 0.032±0.024 | Beta | 0.047±0.029 | Beta | 0.0130±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.011;0.069] | 95% CI | [-0.014;0.078] | 95% CI | [-0.009;0.103] | 95% CI | [-0.003;0.028] | |||
| P value | 0.159 | P value | 0.176 | P value | 0.100 | P value | 0.108 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs16890979 | T/C | Beta | 0.065±0.108 | Beta | 0.024±0.123 | Beta | 0.034±0.149 | Beta | -0.012±0.041 |
| 95% CI | [-0.146;0.276] | 95% CI | [-0.217;0.265] | 95% CI | [-0.258;0.327] | 95% CI | [-0.092;0.069] | |||
| P value | 0.548 | P value | 0.845 | P value | 0.818 | P value | 0.774 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs3775948 | C/G | Beta | -0.018±0.02 | Beta | -0.011±0.023 | Beta | -0.014±0.028 | Beta | -0.001±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.057;0.021] | 95% CI | [-0.055;0.034] | 95% CI | [-0.068;0.040] | 95% CI | [-0.015;0.014] | |||
| P value | 0.364 | P value | 0.641 | P value | 0.624 | P value | 0.937 | |||
| SLC2A9-WDR1 | rs10489070 | C/G | Beta | -0.020±0.028 | Beta | -0.061±0.032 | Beta | -0.06±0.038 | Beta | -0.018±0.011 |
| 95% CI | [-0.074;0.034] | 95% CI | [-0.123;0.001] | 95% CI | [-0.135;0.015] | 95% CI | [-0.039;0.002] | |||
| P value | 0.469 | P value | 0.055 | P value | 0.120 | P value | 0.081 | |||
| ABCG2 | rs2231142 | A/C | Beta | -0.002±0.021 | Beta | 0.014±0.024 | Beta | 0.0002±0.029 | Beta | -0.001±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.043;0.039] | 95% CI | [-0.033;0.060] | 95% CI | [-0.057;0.057] | 95% CI | [-0.016;0.015] | |||
| P value | 0.927 | P value | 0.568 | P value | 0.994 | P value | 0.917 | |||
| LRRC16A | rs742132 | C/T | Beta | -0.032±0.020 | Beta | -0.021±0.023 | Beta | -0.073±0.028 | Beta | -0.015±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.071;0.008] | 95% CI | [-0.066;0.024] | 95% CI | [-0.128;-0.018] | 95% CI | [-0.030;0.0004] | |||
| P value | 0.118 | P value | 0.366 | P value | 0.009 | P value | 0.058 | |||
| SLC17A1 | rs1183201 | T/A | Beta | 0.010±0.025 | Beta | -0.009±0.029 | Beta | 0.035±0.035 | Beta | 0.010±0.010 |
| 95% CI | [-0.039;0.059] | 95% CI | [-0.065;0.047] | 95% CI | [-0.033;0.103] | 95% CI | [-0.009;0.028] | |||
| P value | 0.696 | P value | 0.763 | P value | 0.316 | P value | 0.308 | |||
| SLC17A3 | rs1165205 | A/T | Beta | 0.009±0.025 | Beta | -0.012±0.028 | Beta | 0.023±0.034 | Beta | 0.011±0.009 |
| 95% CI | [-0.039;0.058] | 95% CI | [-0.068;0.043] | 95% CI | [-0.045;0.090] | 95% CI | [-0.008;0.029] | |||
| P value | 0.715 | P value | 0.662 | P value | 0.510 | P value | 0.245 | |||
| rs1333049 | C/G | Beta | -0.004±0.019 | Beta | -0.017±0.022 | Beta | -0.015±0.027 | Beta | -0.011±0.007 | |
| 95% CI | [-0.042;0.033] | 95% CI | [-0.060;0.026] | 95% CI | [-0.067;0.037] | 95% CI | [-0.025;0.003] | |||
| P value | 0.818 | P value | 0.451 | P value | 0.579 | P value | 0.124 | |||
| SLC22A11 | rs17300741 | G/A | Beta | 0.049±0.043 | Beta | 0.097±0.049 | Beta | 0.055±0.059 | Beta | 0.036±0.016 |
| 95% CI | [-0.035;0.133] | 95% CI | [0.001;0.193] | 95% CI | [-0.061;0.172] | 95% CI | [0.004;0.068] | |||
| P value | 0.253 | P value | 0.048 | P value | 0.354 | P value | 0.029 | |||
| SLC22A12 | rs506338 | C/T | Beta | 0.025±0.022 | Beta | 0.055±0.025 | Beta | -0.012±0.031 | Beta | 0.0002±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.018;0.069] | 95% CI | [0.006;0.105] | 95% CI | [-0.072;0.049] | 95% CI | [-0.017;0.016] | |||
| P value | 0.252 | P value | 0.030 | P value | 0.703 | P value | 0.982 | |||
| SF1 | rs606458 | G/A | Beta | -0.001±0.020 | Beta | 0.017±0.023 | Beta | -0.027±0.028 | Beta | -0.006±0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.041;0.038] | 95% CI | [-0.028;0.063] | 95% CI | [-0.082;0.028] | 95% CI | [-0.021;0.009] | |||
| P value | 0.948 | P value | 0.453 | P value | 0.335 | P value | 0.418 | |||
P values were adjusted for age and BMI. P values < 0.05 were shown in bold. Log transformed (log10) values were used for HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, Stumvoll-First phase and second phase insulin secretion. The effect allele is the allele to which the β estimate refers.
As shown in Tables 5 and 6, in the females, ABCG2 rs2231142 was associated with fasting plasma glucose (p = 0.002; empirical p = 0.027), while SLC17A1 rs1183210 was significantly associated with 2-h plasma glucose (p = 0.047; empirical p = 0.510). LRP2 rs2544390 and rs1333049 showed significant correlation with fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and Stumvoll second phase insulin secretion (p = 0.028, 0.033 and 0.052; empirical p = 0.346, 0.389, 0.540; p = 0.034, 0.047 and 0.038; empirical p = 0.400, 0.493, 0.430). Meanwhile, SLC2A9 rs11722228 was correlated with 2-h glucose, 2-h insulin and Stumvoll first phase insulin secretion (p = 0.024, 0.049 and 0.049; empirical p = 0.300, 0.511, 0.515). The uric acid-raising allele of SLC2A9 rs16890979 was associated with lower Stumvoll second-phase index of insulin secretion (p = 0.039; empirical p = 0.441). However, the SNPs from PDZK1, SLC17A3 and SLC2A9-WDR showed no association with any quantitative trait of glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in our samples.
Table 5. Association between SNPs from fifteen loci and glucose and insulin levels in females with normal glucose regulation.
| Loci | SNP | Effect/Other Allele | Fasting glucose (n = 1375) | 2-h glucose (n = 1375) | Fasting insulin (n = 715) | 2-h insulin (n = 715) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDZK1 | rs12129861 | A/G | Beta | -0.010±0.025 | Beta | -0.029±0.051 | Beta | 0.003±0.018 | Beta | -0.013±0.024 |
| 95% CI | [-0.060;0.039] | 95% CI | [-0.130;0.071] | 95% CI | [-0.033;0.038] | 95% CI | [-0.061;0.034] | |||
| P value | 0.678 | P value | 0.568 | P value | 0.880 | P value | 0.581 | |||
| GCKR | rs780094 | G/A | Beta | -0.011±0.019 | Beta | 0.046±0.040 | Beta | -0.009±0.014 | Beta | -0.014±0.019 |
| 95% CI | [-0.049;0.026] | 95% CI | [-0.032;0.125] | 95% CI | [-0.036;0.019] | 95% CI | [-0.05;0.023] | |||
| P value | 0.553 | P value | 0.245 | P value | 0.527 | P value | 0.465 | |||
| LRP2 | rs2544390 | T/C | Beta | 0.007±0.019 | Beta | -0.051±0.039 | Beta | 0.030±0.014 | Beta | -0.005±0.019 |
| 95% CI | [-0.030;0.045] | 95% CI | [-0.128;0.026] | 95% CI | [0.003;0.058] | 95% CI | [-0.041;0.032] | |||
| P value | 0.706 | P value | 0.193 | P value | 0.028 | P value | 0.803 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs11722228 | T/C | Beta | -0.0004±0.022 | Beta | -0.101±0.045 | Beta | -0.022±0.016 | Beta | -0.042±0.021 |
| 95% CI | [-0.043;0.042] | 95% CI | [-0.188;-0.013] | 95% CI | [-0.053;0.010] | 95% CI | [-0.083;0] | |||
| P value | 0.985 | P value | 0.024 | P value | 0.174 | P value | 0.049 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs16890979 | T/C | Beta | -0.105±0.076 | Beta | -0.029±0.156 | Beta | 0.043±0.051 | Beta | 0.103±0.068 |
| 95% CI | [-0.255;0.044] | 95% CI | [-0.335;0.278] | 95% CI | [-0.057;0.143] | 95% CI | [-0.031;0.238] | |||
| P value | 0.167 | P value | 0.854 | P value | 0.397 | P value | 0.131 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs3775948 | C/G | Beta | -0.017±0.020 | Beta | 0.043±0.041 | Beta | 0.008±0.014 | Beta | 0.020±0.019 |
| 95% CI | [-0.056;0.022] | 95% CI | [-0.038;0.123] | 95% CI | [-0.020;0.037] | 95% CI | [-0.018;0.058] | |||
| P value | 0.398 | P value | 0.300 | P value | 0.559 | P value | 0.300 | |||
| SLC2A9-WDR1 | rs10489070 | C/G | Beta | 0.028±0.028 | Beta | -0.064±0.059 | Beta | 0.016±0.021 | Beta | 0.012±0.028 |
| 95% CI | [-0.028;0.084] | 95% CI | [-0.178;0.051] | 95% CI | [-0.024;0.056] | 95% CI | [-0.042;0.066] | |||
| P value | 0.325 | P value | 0.278 | P value | 0.437 | P value | 0.667 | |||
| ABCG2 | rs2231142 | A/C | Beta | -0.067±0.021 | Beta | -0.051±0.044 | Beta | 0.009±0.016 | Beta | 0.009±0.021 |
| 95% CI | [-0.109;-0.025] | 95% CI | [-0.137;0.035] | 95% CI | [-0.021;0.040] | 95% CI | [-0.032;0.050] | |||
| P value | 0.002 | P value | 0.246 | P value | 0.553 | P value | 0.664 | |||
| LRRC16A | rs742132 | C/T | Beta | 0.041±0.023 | Beta | 0.034±0.047 | Beta | 0.016±0.017 | Beta | 0.029±0.022 |
| 95% CI | [-0.004;0.086] | 95% CI | [-0.058;0.126] | 95% CI | [-0.017;0.048] | 95% CI | [-0.014;0.073] | |||
| P value | 0.073 | P value | 0.472 | P value | 0.348 | P value | 0.187 | |||
| SLC17A1 | rs1183201 | T/A | Beta | -0.013±0.027 | Beta | -0.109±0.055 | Beta | -0.014±0.020 | Beta | 0.013±0.026 |
| 95% CI | [-0.066;0.039] | 95% CI | [-0.216;-0.001] | 95% CI | [-0.052;0.025] | 95% CI | [-0.038;0.065] | |||
| P value | 0.616 | P value | 0.047 | P value | 0.485 | P value | 0.616 | |||
| SLC17A3 | rs1165205 | A/T | Beta | -0.024±0.027 | Beta | -0.101±0.055 | Beta | -0.015±0.019 | Beta | 0.004±0.026 |
| 95% CI | [0.076;0.028] | 95% CI | [-0.208;0.006] | 95% CI | [-0.053;0.023] | 95% CI | [-0.047;0.055] | |||
| P value | 0.369 | P value | 0.065 | P value | 0.438 | P value | 0.890 | |||
| rs1333049 | C/G | Beta | -0.016±0.020 | Beta | 0.012±0.041 | Beta | 0.031±0.015 | Beta | 0.032±0.020 | |
| 95% CI | [-0.055;0.023] | 95% CI | [-0.069;0.092] | 95% CI | [0.002;0.060] | 95% CI | [-0.006;0.071] | |||
| P value | 0.430 | P value | 0.777 | P value | 0.034 | P value | 0.102 | |||
| SLC22A11 | rs17300741 | G/A | Beta | -0.069±0.043 | Beta | -0.015±0.088 | Beta | 0.028±0.033 | Beta | 0.013±0.044 |
| 95% CI | [-0.153;0.014] | 95% CI | [-0.187;0.157] | 95% CI | [-0.036;0.093] | 95% CI | [-0.073;0.100] | |||
| P value | 0.106 | P value | 0.864 | P value | 0.388 | P value | 0.764 | |||
| SLC22A12 | rs506338 | C/T | Beta | -0.002±0.022 | Beta | -0.068±0.044 | Beta | -0.009±0.015 | Beta | -0.029±0.020 |
| 95% CI | [-0.045;0.040] | 95% CI | [-0.155;0.019] | 95% CI | [-0.039;0.021] | 95% CI | [-0.069;0.011] | |||
| P value | 0.916 | P value | 0.126 | P value | 0.545 | P value | 0.153 | |||
| SF1 | rs606458 | G/A | Beta | -0.026±0.020 | Beta | -0.014±0.042 | Beta | -0.008±0.015 | Beta | -0.008±0.020 |
| 95% CI | [-0.066;0.014] | 95% CI | [-0.096;0.068] | 95% CI | [-0.037;0.020] | 95% CI | [-0.046;0.031] | |||
| P value | 0.197 | P value | 0.738 | P value | 0.566 | P value | 0.700 | |||
P values were adjusted for age and BMI. P values < 0.05 were shown in bold. Log transformed (log10) values were used for fasting and 2-h insulin levels. The effect allele is the allele to which the β estimate refers.
Table 6. Association between SNPs from fifteen loci and insulin secretion and sensitivity indices in females with normal glucose regulation.
| Loci | SNP | Effect/Other Allele | HOMA-IR (n = 715) | HOMA-B (n = 715) | Stumvoll-First phase (n = 715) | Stumvoll-second phase (n = 715) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDZK1 | rs12129861 | A/G | Beta | 0.003±0.019 | Beta | -0.003±0.021 | Beta | -0.013±0.024 | Beta | 0.005;0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.034;0.039] | 95% CI | [-0.044;0.038] | 95% CI | [-0.061;0.034] | 95% CI | [-0.011;0.021] | |||
| P value | 0.886 | P value | 0.891 | P value | 0.581 | P value | 0.575 | |||
| GCKR | rs780094 | G/A | Beta | -0.008±0.014 | Beta | -0.003±0.016 | Beta | -0.014±0.019 | Beta | -0.001;0.006 |
| 95% CI | [-0.036;0.020] | 95% CI | [-0.035;0.029] | 95% CI | [-0.05;0.023] | 95% CI | [-0.014;0.011] | |||
| P value | 0.580 | P value | 0.866 | P value | 0.465 | P value | 0.863 | |||
| LRP2 | rs2544390 | T/C | Beta | 0.031±0.014 | Beta | 0.028±0.016 | Beta | -0.005±0.019 | Beta | 0.012;0.006 |
| 95% CI | [0.002;0.059] | 95% CI | [-0.004;0.060] | 95% CI | [-0.041;0.032] | 95% CI | [0;0.025] | |||
| P value | 0.033 | P value | 0.083 | P value | 0.803 | P value | 0.052 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs11722228 | T/C | Beta | -0.024±0.014 | Beta | -0.014±0.018 | Beta | -0.042±0.021 | Beta | -0.003;0.007 |
| 95% CI | [-0.056;0.008] | 95% CI | [-0.051;0.022] | 95% CI | [-0.083;0] | 95% CI | [-0.017;0.011] | |||
| P value | 0.149 | P value | 0.436 | P value | 0.049 | P value | 0.647 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs16890979 | T/C | Beta | 0.034±0.053 | Beta | 0.086±0.059 | Beta | 0.103±0.068 | Beta | 0.048;0.023 |
| 95% CI | [-0.070;0.137] | 95% CI | [-0.030;0.203] | 95% CI | [-0.031;0.238] | 95% CI | [0.002;0.093] | |||
| P value | 0.523 | P value | 0.147 | P value | 0.131 | P value | 0.039 | |||
| SLC2A9 | rs3775948 | C/G | Beta | 0.007±0.015 | Beta | 0.015±0.017 | Beta | 0.020±0.019 | Beta | 0.002;0.007 |
| 95% CI | [-0.023;0.036] | 95% CI | [-0.018;0.048] | 95% CI | [-0.018;0.058] | 95% CI | [-0.011;0.015] | |||
| P value | 0.657 | P value | 0.379 | P value | 0.300 | P value | 0.756 | |||
| SLC2A9-WDR1 | rs10489070 | C/G | Beta | 0.017±0.021 | Beta | 0.012±0.024 | Beta | 0.012±0.028 | Beta | 0.011;0.009 |
| 95% CI | [-0.025;0.059] | 95% CI | [-0.035;0.059] | 95% CI | [-0.042;0.066] | 95% CI | [-0.008;0.029] | |||
| P value | 0.420 | P value | 0.623 | P value | 0.667 | P value | 0.247 | |||
| ABCG2 | rs2231142 | A/C | Beta | 0.005±0.016 | Beta | 0.024±0.018 | Beta | 0.009±0.021 | Beta | 0.005;0.007 |
| 95% CI | [-0.026;0.037] | 95% CI | [-0.012;0.060] | 95% CI | [-0.032;0.050] | 95% CI | [-0.009;0.019] | |||
| P value | 0.743 | P value | 0.193 | P value | 0.664 | P value | 0.454 | |||
| LRRC16A | rs742132 | C/T | Beta | 0.019±0.017 | Beta | 0.006±0.019 | Beta | 0.029±0.022 | Beta | 0.007;0.008 |
| 95% CI | [-0.015;0.052] | 95% CI | [-0.032;0.043] | 95% CI | [-0.014;0.073] | 95% CI | [-0.008;0.022] | |||
| P value | 0.276 | P value | 0.773 | P value | 0.187 | P value | 0.345 | |||
| SLC17A1 | rs1183201 | T/A | Beta | -0.013±0.020 | Beta | -0.013±0.023 | Beta | 0.013±0.026 | Beta | 0.003;0.009 |
| 95% CI | [-0.053;0.027] | 95% CI | [-0.058;0.032] | 95% CI | [-0.038;0.065] | 95% CI | [-0.014;0.021] | |||
| P value | 0.522 | P value | 0.571 | P value | 0.616 | P value | 0.725 | |||
| SLC17A3 | rs1165205 | A/T | Beta | -0.015±0.020 | Beta | -0.011±0.023 | Beta | 0.004±0.026 | Beta | 0.001;0.009 |
| 95% CI | [-0.054;0.024] | 95% CI | [-0.055;0.033] | 95% CI | [-0.047;0.055] | 95% CI | [-0.016;0.018] | |||
| P value | 0.459 | P value | 0.619 | P value | 0.890 | P value | 0.918 | |||
| rs1333049 | C/G | Beta | 0.030±0.015 | Beta | 0.031±0.017 | Beta | 0.032±0.020 | Beta | 0.014;0.007 | |
| 95% CI | [0;0.060] | 95% CI | [-0.002;0.065] | 95% CI | [-0.006;0.071] | 95% CI | [0.001;0.027] | |||
| P value | 0.047 | P value | 0.066 | P value | 0.102 | P value | 0.038 | |||
| SLC22A11 | rs17300741 | G/A | Beta | 0.016±0.034 | Beta | 0.062±0.038 | Beta | 0.013±0.044 | Beta | 0.012;0.015 |
| 95% CI | [-0.050;0.082] | 95% CI | [-0.013;0.137] | 95% CI | [-0.073;0.100] | 95% CI | [-0.017;0.041] | |||
| P value | 0.636 | P value | 0.106 | P value | 0.764 | P value | 0.420 | |||
| SLC22A12 | rs506338 | C/T | Beta | -0.008±0.016 | Beta | -0.014±0.018 | Beta | -0.029±0.020 | Beta | -0.002;0.007 |
| 95% CI | [-0.039;0.023] | 95% CI | [-0.049;0.020] | 95% CI | [-0.069;0.011] | 95% CI | [-0.016;0.011] | |||
| P value | 0.615 | P value | 0.419 | P value | 0.153 | P value | 0.740 | |||
| SF1 | rs606458 | G/A | Beta | -0.010±0.015 | Beta | -0.005±0.017 | Beta | -0.008±0.020 | Beta | -0.003;0.007 |
| 95% CI | [-0.039;0.020] | 95% CI | [-0.038;0.029] | 95% CI | [-0.046;0.031] | 95% CI | [-0.016;0.010] | |||
| P value | 0.528 | P value | 0.786 | P value | 0.700 | P value | 0.655 | |||
P values were adjusted for age and BMI. P values < 0.05 were shown in bold. Log transformed (log10) values were used for HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, Stumvoll-First phase and second phase insulin secretion. The effect allele is the allele to which the β estimate refers.
Discussion
In this study, we attempted to investigate the effects of recently reported uric acid-associated loci on the risk of T2D as well as the quantitative traits related to glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in a Chinese population. We confirmed the association of GCKR and SF1 with T2D. Additionally, in the males, we observed that LRRC16A rs742132 were associated with the serum 2-h insulin and insulin secretion indices; whereas SLC22A11 rs17300741 had an impact on β-cell function and insulin secretion. The SNP of rs506338 in SLC22A12 showed strong influence on β-cell function as well as SLC2A9 rs3775948 significantly affected the serum 2-h glucose. In the females, the uric acid-raising alleles of LRP2 rs2544390 and rs1333049 were associated with an increased fasting insulin level, HOMA-IR and second phase insulin secretion. The uric acid-raising T allele in SLC2A9 rs11722228 could not increase the level of 2-h glucose; however, it elevated the 2-h insulin and first phase insulin secretion. The uric acid-lowering alleles of SLC2A9 rs16890979 and SLC17A1 rs1183210 were associated with increased second phase insulin secretion and the 2-h glucose levels, respectively. The risk allele of elevated uric acid levels in ABCG2 rs2231142 was shown to increase the fasting glucose levels. However, the effect of these SNPs on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion (i.e., an increased or decreased effect) was not consistent. This finding suggests that exploring the potential mechanisms of these loci on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion is important in elucidating the links between uric acid disorders and T2D.
We demonstrated that the SNPs from GCKR and SF1 had an effect on T2D in our samples. Note that GCKR was reported to be independently susceptible to T2D in multiple populations [21, 22]. Recently, GCKR involvement was identified in regulating serum uric acid levels [19, 23, 24]. In addition, the uric acid-raising allele in GCKR [14] could increase the risk of T2D in the Chinese population. This result further highlights the link between uric acid disorders and T2D. SF1 rs606458 has been associated with uric acid levels in individuals of African American, European and Chinese ancestry. In accordance with the effects of GCKR, the uric acid-raising allele in SF1 (my paper) could increase the risk of T2D in a Chinese population. However, as the cultural diversity, risk allele frequency and pattern of linkage disequilibrium differed in various populations, reports on the risk allele of uric acid in GCKR and SFI from foreign studies contradicted that in the Chinese population [23–25]. We failed to detect the effects of SF1 on T2D in males, and previous studies have demonstrated the effects of SF1 on uric acid levels in males. Based on these inconsistencies, further study is needed.
In the males, the uric acid-raising A-allele in LRRC16A rs742132 were associated with the increase of serum 2-h insulin and insulin secretion. LRRC16A rs742132 was reported to exert strong effects on serum uric acid concentration and gout, but the functional role of this SNP remains unclear. Combined with the results that the rs742132 played roles in insulin secretion, further studies are necessary to investigate whether this intronic SNP would regulate LRRC16A gene expression when involved in the uric acid and insulin metabolism. In addition, the G-allele in SLC22A11 rs17300741 causes lower uric acid levels, improved β-cell function and elevated insulin secretion. Human organic anion transporter 4 (OAT4/SLC22A11) is expressed on the apical membrane of renal proximaltubule cells and placenta in the kidney and mediates the transport of uric acid [26–28]. The uric acid-raising G-allele in SLC22A11 rs17300741 plays roles similar to those of the uric acid-lowering A-allele in LRRC16A rs742132. The strength of the associations between the SLC22A11 and LRRC16A loci was not affected by the serum uric acid levels or other confounders, which suggests a greater likelihood of a direct effect on insulin secretion and insulin resistance.
In the females, the uric acid-raised allele in LRP2 rs2544390 and rs1333049 was significantly correlated with increased fasting insulin levels, HOMA-IR and Stumvoll second phase insulin secretion. LRP2 encodes low-density lipoprotein-related protein 2, which is a member of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family. Few studies have reported its association with uric acid transportation. LRP2 is a multi-ligand receptor expressed in various tissues, predominantly in the kidneys, particularly in the glomeruli and proximal tubular cells; therefore, LRP2 may play a role in renal reabsorption through its ligands, including insulin [29, 30]. This study showed that LRP2 increased serum insulin levels and insulin secretion and reduced insulin sensitivity, which could, conversely, affect LRP2-ligands and result in elevated uric acid levels through enhanced renal reabsorption. SLC2A9 rs11722228 was correlated with 2-h glucose, 2-h insulin and Stumvoll first phase insulin secretion. SLC2A9, as a glucose and uric acid transporter facilitator, could deregulate the glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells [31, 32]. In the first phase of insulin secretion, β-cells sense extracellular glucose concentration through the uptake of glucose by the glucose transporter. According to recent reports, GLUT9 is expressed in β-cells and is expected to participate in glucose sensing in β-cells [31], which may elucidate the finding that the uric acid-raising allele SLC2A9 rs11722228 simultaneously increased 2-h glucose and insulin secretion. The uric acid-raising allele of SLC2A9 rs16890979 was associated with decreased second phase insulin secretion, which may be attributed to the polygenetic background of uric acid disorders and T2D and associated complex environmental factors. Note that elevated uric acid levels and insulin resistance interacted with each other. Elevated uric acid levels lead to insulin resistance through two mechanisms. First, the endothelial dysfunction caused by increased uric acid levels may reduce the endothelial NO production, which plays a role in insulin action [33]. The reduced endothelial NO levels could lower blood flow to the skeletal muscle and peripheral tissues and decrease glucose uptake, which may lead to or aggravate insulin resistance [34]. Second, uric acid induces inflammation and oxidative stress in cultured adipocytes [35]. While in the adipocyte, inflammation and oxidative stress could contribute to insulin resistance [36]. Alternatively, insulin resistance could result in hyperinsulinemia; thus, high levels of insulin could stimulate the proximal tubule brush border in the kidneys, promote the exchange of uric acid and sodium ions, increase uric acid reabsorption, reduce uric acid clearance and elevate uric acid levels [37]. In addition, as a member of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily of membrane transporters, ABCG2 rs2231142 also act as a uric acid transporter and it is well-known that the dysfunction of ABCG2 can cause hyperuricemia [38]. The present study showed strong association between this SNP with fasting glucose. The disorder of serum uric acid and glucose levels is regulated by many complex factors in humans, including genetic contribution. Nowadays, few study is conducted to discover the genetic links between the rs2231142 and glucose. With the identification of the uric acid-raising allele elevating glucose levels, the functional experiments is needed to further explore the role of ABCG2 in regulating glucose levels.
This study has some limitations. First, we cannot exclude the possibility of a false positive in our findings when analysed multiple traits and SNPs in this study. As these 14 SNPs were originally identified and confirmed by many large-scale studies to be associated with uric acid as well as all traits were highly related, the effect of multiple comparisons may be limited. Second, we only analysed the effects of these uric acid loci on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in the normal glucose regulation subjects because most of the type 2 diabetes patients were receiving glucose lowering therapy. However, according to recent reports, the effect of genetic variation on insulin secretion depends on glycaemia [38, 39], future investigation is needed to explore the effects of these variants on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion. Third, only the reported uric acid-associated loci were analysed in this study. Because uric acid disorders were significantly associated with T2D, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion, a future large-scale study is needed to explore in detail the potential genetic links between these factors. Fourth, as rs16890979 and rs17300741 are rare in Chinese population, the present study had limited power to detect the effect of these SNPs on T2D, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion. Finally, we didn’t adjust the other confounding factors, such as diet, alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking, as these may bias the association between uric acid-associated genes and T2D, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion.
We analysed the effects of the SNPs from eleven uric acid-associated loci on the risk of T2D, glucose metabolism and insulin secretion and showed that GCKR rs780094 and SF1 rs606458 variants have an impact on the risk of T2D and LRRC16A, SLC22A11 and SLC22A12 play roles in regulating glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in Chinese males as well as ABCG2, SLC17A1 and LRP2 in Chinese females. The variants in SLC2A9 modulate glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in both Chinese males and females. Future large-scale studies should further investigate the potential genetic links between uric acid-associated loci and glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in multiple populations.
Acknowledgments
We thank the participants in this research. We thank the nursing and medical staff at the Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes for their dedication to this study.
Data Availability
Due to the sensitive nature of the data and the consent agreements signed by participants, data cannot be made publicly available. Data are available upon request. Please include a proposal for use of the data, which will be submitted to the authors’ ethics committee for approval. Requests for the data may be sent to alfredhc@sjtu.edu.cn. The authors confirm that all interested parties will be able to obtain the data via the contact provided after some documentation is completed.
Funding Statement
The authors acknowledge grants from NSFC (81322010), Excellent Young Medical Expert of Shanghai (XYQ2011041), Shanghai Rising Star Program (12QH1401700), Shanghai Talent Development Grant (2012041) and National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Stumvoll M, Goldstein BJ, van Haeften TW (2005) Type 2 diabetes: principles of pathogenesis and therapy. Lancet 365: 1333–1346. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61032-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kodama S, Saito K, Yachi Y, Asumi M, Sugawara A, et al. (2009) Association between serum uric acid and development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32: 1737–1742. 10.2337/dc09-0288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Modan M, Halkin H, Karasik A, Lusky A (1987) Elevated serum uric acid—a facet of hyperinsulinaemia. Diabetologia 30: 713–718. 10.1007/BF00296994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jia Z, Zhang X, Kang S, Wu Y (2013) Serum uric acid levels and incidence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fan HQ, Tang W, Wang ZX, Wang SJ, Qin YH, et al. (2013) Association of serum uric acid with 2-hour postload glucose in Chinese with impaired fasting plasma glucose and/or HbA1c. PLoS One 8: e67759 10.1371/journal.pone.0067759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ishizaka N, Ishizaka Y, Toda E, Nagai R, Yamakado M (2005) Association between serum uric acid, metabolic syndrome, and carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese individuals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 1038–1044. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000161274.87407.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Roncal CA, Reungjui S, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Mu W, Sautin YY, et al. (2009) Combination of captopril and allopurinol retards fructose-induced metabolic syndrome. Am J Nephrol 30: 399–404. 10.1159/000235731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhang Y, Yamamoto T, Hisatome I, Li Y, Cheng W, et al. (2013) Uric acid induces oxidative stress and growth inhibition by activating adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase signal pathways in pancreatic beta cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 375: 89–96. 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jia L, Xing J, Ding Y, Shen Y, Shi X, et al. (2013) Hyperuricemia causes pancreatic beta-cell death and dysfunction through NF-kappaB signaling pathway. PLoS One 8: e78284 10.1371/journal.pone.0078284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Simental-Mendia LE, Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F (2009) Failure of beta-cell function to compensate lack of insulin action in hyperuricemic subjects. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 25: 535–541. 10.1002/dmrr.988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tang W, Fu Q, Zhang Q, Sun M, Gao Y, et al. (2014) The association between serum uric acid and residual beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res 2014: 709691 10.1155/2014/709691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Nath SD, Voruganti VS, Arar NH, Thameem F, Lopez-Alvarenga JC, et al. (2007) Genome scan for determinants of serum uric acid variability. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 3156–3163. 10.1681/ASN.2007040426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liu WC, Hung CC, Chen SC, Lin MY, Chen LI, et al. (2011) The rs1014290 polymorphism of the SLC2A9 gene is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Han Chinese. Exp Diabetes Res 2011: 527520 10.1155/2011/527520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sun X, Jiang F, Zhang R, Tang SS, Chen M, et al. (2014) Serum uric acid levels are associated with polymorphisms in the SLC2A9, SF1, and GCKR genes in a Chinese population. Acta Pharmacol Sin 35: 1421–1427. 10.1038/aps.2014.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jia WP, Pang C, Chen L, Bao YQ, Lu JX, et al. (2007) Epidemiological characteristics of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in a Chinese adult population: the Shanghai Diabetes Studies, a cross-sectional 3-year follow-up study in Shanghai urban communities. Diabetologia 50: 286–292. 10.1007/s00125-006-0503-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bao Y, Ma X, Li H, Zhou M, Hu C, et al. (2010) Glycated haemoglobin A1c for diagnosing diabetes in Chinese population: cross sectional epidemiological survey. BMJ 340: c2249 10.1136/bmj.c2249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, et al. (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28: 412–419. 10.1007/BF00280883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Stumvoll M, Van Haeften T, Fritsche A, Gerich J (2001) Oral glucose tolerance test indexes for insulin sensitivity and secretion based on various availabilities of sampling times. Diabetes Care 24: 796–797. 10.2337/diacare.24.4.796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wang B, Meng D, Wang J, Liu S, Zhou S, et al. (2011) Genetic association of polymorphism rs1333049 with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50: 1559–1561. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559–575. 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dupuis J, Langenberg C, Prokopenko I, Saxena R, Soranzo N, et al. (2010) New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet 42: 105–116. 10.1038/ng.520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hu C, Zhang R, Wang C, Yu W, Lu J, et al. (2010) Effects of GCK, GCKR, G6PC2 and MTNR1B variants on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion. PLoS One 5: e11761 10.1371/journal.pone.0011761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kolz M, Johnson T, Sanna S, Teumer A, Vitart V, et al. (2009) Meta-analysis of 28,141 individuals identifies common variants within five new loci that influence uric acid concentrations. PLoS Genet 5: e1000504 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. van der Harst P, Bakker SJ, de Boer RA, Wolffenbuttel BH, Johnson T, et al. (2010) Replication of the five novel loci for uric acid concentrations and potential mediating mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 19: 387–395. 10.1093/hmg/ddp489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tin A, Woodward OM, Kao WH, Liu CT, Lu X, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association study for serum urate concentrations and gout among African Americans identifies genomic risk loci and a novel URAT1 loss-of-function allele. Hum Mol Genet 20: 4056–4068. 10.1093/hmg/ddr307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sakiyama M, Matsuo H, Shimizu S, Nakashima H, Nakayama A, et al. (2014) A common variant of organic anion transporter 4 (OAT4/SLC22A11) gene is associated with renal underexcretion type gout. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 29: 208–210. 10.2133/dmpk.DMPK-13-NT-070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Cha SH, Sekine T, Kusuhara H, Yu E, Kim JY, et al. (2000) Molecular cloning and characterization of multispecific organic anion transporter 4 expressed in the placenta. J Biol Chem 275: 4507–4512. 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ekaratanawong S, Anzai N, Jutabha P, Miyazaki H, Noshiro R, et al. (2004) Human organic anion transporter 4 is a renal apical organic anion/dicarboxylate exchanger in the proximal tubules. J Pharmacol Sci 94: 297–304. 10.1254/jphs.94.297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Orlando RA, Rader K, Authier F, Yamazaki H, Posner BI, et al. (1998) Megalin is an endocytic receptor for insulin. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 1759–1766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nakayama A, Matsuo H, Shimizu T, Takada Y, Nakamura T, et al. (2014) Common variants of a urate-associated gene LRP2 are not associated with gout susceptibility. Rheumatol Int 34: 473–476. 10.1007/s00296-013-2924-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Evans SA, Doblado M, Chi MM, Corbett JA, Moley KH (2009) Facilitative glucose transporter 9 expression affects glucose sensing in pancreatic beta-cells. Endocrinology 150: 5302–5310. 10.1210/en.2009-0747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Keembiyehetty C, Augustin R, Carayannopoulos MO, Steer S, Manolescu A, et al. (2006) Mouse glucose transporter 9 splice variants are expressed in adult liver and kidney and are up-regulated in diabetes. Mol Endocrinol 20: 686–697. 10.1210/me.2005-0010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Roy D, Perreault M, Marette A (1998) Insulin stimulation of glucose uptake in skeletal muscles and adipose tissues in vivo is NO dependent. Am J Physiol 274: E692–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Duplain H, Burcelin R, Sartori C, Cook S, Egli M, et al. (2001) Insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 104: 342–345. 10.1161/01.CIR.104.3.342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sautin YY, Nakagawa T, Zharikov S, Johnson RJ (2007) Adverse effects of the classic antioxidant uric acid in adipocytes: NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative/nitrosative stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C584–596. 10.1152/ajpcell.00600.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, et al. (2004) Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 114: 1752–1761. 10.1172/JCI21625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bhole V, Choi JW, Kim SW, de Vera M, Choi H (2010) Serum uric acid levels and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study. Am J Med 123: 957–961. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.03.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Heni M, Ketterer C, Hart LM, Ranta F, van Haeften TW, et al. (2010) The impact of genetic variation in the G6PC2 gene on insulin secretion depends on glycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: E479–484. 10.1210/jc.2010-0860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Heni M, Ketterer C, Thamer C, Herzberg-Schafer SA, Guthoff M, et al. (2010) Glycemia determines the effect of type 2 diabetes risk genes on insulin secretion. Diabetes 59: 3247–3252. 10.2337/db10-0674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Due to the sensitive nature of the data and the consent agreements signed by participants, data cannot be made publicly available. Data are available upon request. Please include a proposal for use of the data, which will be submitted to the authors’ ethics committee for approval. Requests for the data may be sent to alfredhc@sjtu.edu.cn. The authors confirm that all interested parties will be able to obtain the data via the contact provided after some documentation is completed.