Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;21(4):1158–1166. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1158

Table 3.

Comparison between patients with and without significant liver fibrosis (> 7 kPa)

Variables Patients without significant fibrosis [n = 148 (93.1%), LS value7 kPa] Patients with significant fibrosis [n = 11 (6.9%), LS value > 7 kPa] P value
Age, yr 55.5 ± 10.4 63.2 ± 11.5 NS
Male gender 80 (54.1) 7 (63.6) NS
Body mass index, kg/m2 24.1 ± 3.0 27.5 ± 3.0 0.001
Diabetes mellitus 17 (11.5) 2 (18.2) NS
Hypertension 38 (25.7) 2 (18.2) NS
Daily alcohol intake, mg 16.2 ± 31.7 11.0 ± 16.4 NS
Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L 22.2 ± 11.4 32.3 ± 17.1 0.024
Platelet count, 109/L 235.6 ± 55.5 234.2 ± 92.0 NS
Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL 99.7 ± 24.3 106.1 ± 24.9 NS
HOMA-IR 1.7 ± 1.2 2.9 ± 2.0 0.034
HbA1c, % 6.0 ± 0.7 6.2 ± 0.6 NS
Presence of fatty liver on Sonography, n 53 (35.8%) 9 (81.8%) 0.004
Intimal media thickness, mm 0.7 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 2.1 0.011
Presence of carotid plaque 31 (20.9) 3 (27.3) NS
Calcified carotid plaque, n 0.4 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 1.8 0.019
Visceral fat area, cm2 107.2 ± 47.7 171.5 ± 93.0 0.002
Controlled attenuation parameter, dB/m 246.4 ± 43.8 266.7 ± 45.6 NS

Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (range), median (range), or n (%). NS: Not significant; LS: Liver stiffness; HOMA-IR: Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin.