Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 16;5(12):1221–1237. doi: 10.1021/cn500153z

Table 5. Predicted Affinities and Cooperativities for VU0155094 across the Group III mGlus Using Calcium Assays with Chimeric G Proteins Reveals Distinct Receptor–PAM Interactionsa.

  mGlu4
mGlu7
mGlu8
  Glu L-AP4 LSP4-2022 Glu L-AP4 LSP4-2022 Glu L-AP4 LSP4-2022
pKB 4.88 ± 0.03 4.88 ± 0.05d 4.97 ± 0.10 4.77 ± 0.18c 5.38 ± 0.22cd 5.10 ± 0.17e 5.07 ± 0.37 4.83 ± 0.07d 4.85 ± 0.08e
KB (μM) 13.3 13.2 10.6 17 4.2 8.0 8.6 14.7 14.0
log τB n.a n.a n.a –0.17 ± 0.03 –0.09 ± 0.04 –0.22 ± 0.06 –0.12 ± 0.03 –0.14 ± 0.04 –0.10 ± 0.06
τB n.a n.a n.a 0.81 1.16 0.61 0.75 0.73 0.80
log β 0.16 ± 0.08fh 0.67 ± 0.27fi 0.33 ± 0.07j 0.68 ± 0.12gh 0.07 ± 0.03gi –0.10 ± 0.10gj 0.08 ± 0.02h 0.05 ± 0.03i 0.05 ± 0.06j
β 1.4 4.7 2.1 4.8 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.1
log α 0.28 ± 0.07 –0.15 ± 0.30k 0.17 ± 0.13l 0.58 ± 0.13 0.39 ± 0.21 0.82 ± 0.26l 0.61 ± 0.39 0.92 ± 0.08k 0.93 ± 0.06l
α 1.9 0.71 1.5 3.8 2.4 6.6 4.1 8.3 8.6
n 6.2 ± 1.8 2.0 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.03 2.3 ± 0.4 6.7 ± 3.1 2.9 ± 1.2 4.6 ± 2.5 2.9 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 0.3
basal 6.9 ± 1.8 7.1 ± 0.7 7.6 ± 0.6 0.4 ± 2.3 3.3 ± 2.4 3.8 ± 0.8 3.3 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.5
Emb 195.7 195.7 195.7 377.2 377.2 377.2 102.3 102.3 102.3
a

Data were fitted from curves shown in Figure S4 (Supporting Information) using eq 2. The α value was shared between data sets, and the Em was constrained to the maximal level of potentiation observed for that subtype between any combination of ligands in a given experiment. For statistical analyses, pKB, log α, and log β values were compared between agonists at one receptor and then separately between receptors for a given agonist. All statistical tests were one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s post-test to compare all columns. Data are comprised of three individual experiments performed in duplicate (mean ± SD values shown).

b

Em value constrained to the maximal level of potentiation observed for that subtype between any combination of ligands in a given experiment; the mean is reported. All p values <0.05.

c

pKB between mGlu7/glutamate versus mGlu7/L-AP4.

d

pKB between mGlu7/L-AP4 versus mGlu4/L-AP4 and mGlu8/L-AP4.

e

pKB between mGlu7/LSP4-2022 versus mGlu8/LSP4-022.

f

Log β between mGlu4/glutamate versus mGlu4/L-AP4.

g

Log β between mGlu7/glutamate versus mGlu7/L-AP4 and mGlu7/LSP4-2022.

h

Log β between mGlu7/glutamate versus mGlu4/glutamate and mGlu8/glutamate.

i

Log β between mGlu4/L-AP4 versus mGlu7/L-AP4 and mGlu8/L-AP4.

j

Log β between mGlu4/LSP4-2022 versus mGlu7/LSP4-2022 and mGlu8/LSP4-2022.

k

Log α of mGlu4/L-AP4 versus mGlu8/L-AP4.

l

Log α of mGlu4/LSP4-2022 versus mGlu7/LSP4-2022 and mGlu8/LSP4-2022.