Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2001 Jul 17;104(3):310–316. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.310

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A, Difference (central minus local) between central and local measurements of fractional shortening (%) from 724 echocardiograms against mean fractional shortening. B, Difference (central minus local) between central and local measurements of end-diastolic dimension (cm) from 724 echocardiograms against mean end-diastolic dimension. C, Differences (central minus local) between central and local measurement of end-diastolic wall thickness (cm) from 735 echocardiograms against mean end-diastolic wall thickness. D, Difference (central minus local) between central and local measurements of end-diastolic septal wall thickness (cm) from 726 echocardiograms against mean end-diastolic septal wall thickness. Dotted lines are mean difference and 95% prediction interval; solid lines, clinically acceptable limits.