Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 19;15(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0414-y

Table 2.

Comparison of EPMLR with other methods

Methods Dataset used Performances
Sn (%) Sp (%) P (%) Acc (%) AUC
ABCpred BEOD 57.19 51.75 54.24 54.47 0.547
AAP 60.25 54.01 40.53 56.15 0.582
BCPred 65.04 51.87 41.28 56.38 0.615
EPMLR 81.79 45.87 64.07 63.83 0.728
SVMTriP SVMTriP 80.1 Unavailable 55.2 Unavailable 0.702
EPMLR 80.56 32.30 54.9 56.43 0.644
LBtope LFNR 54.38 ~ 65.88 57.31 ~ 63.97 Unavailable 55.85 ~ 64.86 0.57 ~ 0.69
EPMLR 60.76 56.14 57.99 58.45 0.62