Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;27(2):252–267. doi: 10.1017/S0954422414000183

Table 1.

Relationship between increases in bone resorption rate and fracture risk

Study Age (years) Fracture RR-BMD* 95 % CI Marker RR-marker 95 % CI
Women EPIDOS( 74 ) >75 Hip 2·8 1·6, 5·1 Urinary CTX 2·2 1·3, 3·6
OFELY( 83 ) 64 (mean) All 2·8 1·4, 5·6 Urinary CTX 2·3 1·3, 4·1
Serum CTX 2·1 1·1, 3·6
HOS( 84 ) 69 (mean) All 1·6 1·2, 2·2 Urinary CTX 1·6 1·2, 2·0
Rotterdam( 85 ) >75 All 1·3 0·6, 2·8 Urinary DPD 1·9 1·2, 3·8
Malmö OPRA( 86 ) >75 All 2·2 1·5, 3·1 TRAP 2·2 1·2, 4·2
Men DOES( 87 ) 72 (mean) All 1·8 1·4, 2·3 ICTP 1·4 1·0, 1·9
2·8 1·4, 5·4

RR, relative risk; BMD, bone mineral density; EPIDOS, Epidemiology of Osteoporosis; CTX, carboxy terminal telopeptide of collagen type I; OFELY, Os de Femmes de Lyon; HOS, Hawaii Osteoporosis Study; DPD, free deoxypyridinoline; OPRA, Osteoporosis Prospective Risk Assessment; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; DOES, Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study; ICTP, C-terminal telopeptide generated by metalloproteinases.

*

RR-BMD =  RR for fracture by 1 sd decrease in BMD.

RR-marker =  RR for fracture by 1 sd increase in marker above the premenopausal normal range.

For the highest quintile.