Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 27;10(1):e0116773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116773

Table 1. Effect of NR3C1 ligands on 2×GRE activation in the presence and absence of TNF.

Naive +TNF
E max (% Dex) pEC50 (M) E max (% Dex) pEC50 (M)
Dexamethasone 100 ± 3.2 7.6 ± 0.1 58.7 ± 3.2 7.5 ± 0.1 *
Fluticasone Propionate 111.2 ± 4.3 8.2 ± 0.1 51.0 ± 2.8 8.2 ± 0.1
Budesonide 109.9 ± 2.6 8.2 ± 0.1 56.9 ± 2.0 8.1 ± 0.1
Fluticasone Furoate 108.0 ± 2.9 8.8 ± 0.0 57.8 ± 1.5 8.7 ± 0.0
GSK9027 77.2 ± 1.0 7.1 ± 0.0 40.7 ± 0.9 7.0 ± 0.1
Des-ciclesonide 76.0 ± 2.0 8.6 ± 0.1 43.1 ± 1.0 8.5 ± 0.1
RU24858 74.9 ± 1.1 7.4 ± 0.0 46.0 ± 0.8 7.3 ± 0.0 *
GW870086X 50.1 ± 1.1 8.3 ± 0.1 29.8 ± 1.4 8.0 ± 0.2 *

BEAS-2B cells harboring a 2×GRE reporter were either not treated (Naive) or were pre-treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF; 10 ng/ml) for 1 h, prior to addition of a maximally effective concentration of the indicated NR3C1 ligands. After 6 h, cells were harvested for luciferase assay. Data are from Fig. 5 and are expressed as a percent of 1 μM dexamethasone treatment (Naïve: E Max = 6.3 ± 0.2 fold; +TNF E Max = 3.7 ± 0.2 fold). Statistical analyses were conducted by Student’s t test to compare the EC50s of the ligand in the presence and absence of TNF, as indicated: P < 0.05 *.