Abstract
Comparisons of six hypothetical cases suggest that Haldane overstimated the cost of natural selection by allele substitution. The cost is reduced if recessive alleles are advantageous, if substitutions are large and few, if selection is strong and substitutions are rapid, if substitutions are serial, and if substitutions in small demes are followed by deme-group substitutions. But costs are still so heavy that the adaptations of complex organisms in complex and changing environments are never completed. The rule probably is that most species most of the time are not fully adapted to their environments, but are just a little better than their competitors for the time being.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Darlington P. F., Jr Rates, patterns, and effectiveness of evolution in multi-level situations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Apr;73(4):1360–1364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.4.1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlington P. J., Jr Group selection, altruism, reinforcement, and throwing in human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3748–3752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dobzhansky T. Species of Drosophila. Science. 1972 Aug 25;177(4050):664–669. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4050.664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flake R. H., Grant V. An analysis of the cost-of-selection concept. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Sep;71(9):3716–3720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.9.3716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant V., Flake R. H. Population structure in relation to cost of selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1670–1671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant V., Flake R. H. Solutions to the cost-of-selection dilemma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Oct;71(10):3863–3865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]