. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.

Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2014 Nov 12;166(2):302–308.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.008

Table 2.

Correlations between memory indices and participant characteristics by weight status

	Non-Overweight (n = 73)				Overweight/obese (n = 53)

	Relational Memory		Item Memory		Relational Memory		Item Memory

	Accuracy	PDV	Accuracy	PDV	Accuracy	PDV	Accuracy	^a PDV

Age	0.16	0.03	0.06	−0.05	0.14	0.05	0.10	0.13
^b Sex	0.18	0.18	0.30^**	0.19	0.29^*	0.10	0.09	−0.07
Pubertal Timing	−0.12	0.07	−0.01	0.02	−0.20	−.251^*	−0.10	−0.08
SES	−0.05	0.23^*	0.03	0.06	0.22	−0.19	0.25^*	0.01
IQ	0.08	0.20^*	0.13	0.12	0.14	−0.15	0.21	0.14
BMI z-score	−0.05	−0.18	0.09	0.13	−0.19	−0.10	−0.14	0.03
Fat-free VO_2max	0.20^*	−0.05	−0.06	−0.03	0.05	−0.12	0.15	0.15
%WBFM	−0.05	−0.12	−0.08	0.06	−0.36^**	−0.07	−0.20	0.15
SAAT	−0.10	−0.11	−0.16	−0.01	−0.46^**	−0.15	−0.24^*	0.07
VAT	0.15	0.10	0.30^**	0.17	−0.23^*	−0.03	−0.11	0.12
TAAT	−0.07	−0.09	−0.09	0.03	−0.45^**	−0.14	−0.23	0.08

Data only available for 116 participants (67 non-overweight, 49 overweight/obese)

Females coded as 0 and males coded as 1

^**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

PDV, preferential disproportionate viewing; SES, socioeconomic status; IQ, intelligence quotient; SAAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; TAAT, total fat in abdominal region of interest