Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr 18;73(3):1228–1236. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25232

Table 3.

Mean R2’, spatial SD and sample SD measured in GM and WM for the combined approach, standard GESFIDE and GESSE, with and without multi-exponential R2 correction.

GM R2’ (s−1) WM R2’ (s−1)
Mean Spatial
SD		 Sample
SD		 Statistical
Significance		 Mean Spatial
SD		 Sample
SD		 Statistical
Significance
Combined approach 3.4 2.7 0.4 4.3 2.1 0.5
Combined approach with TE matching 3.3 2.6 0.4 4.0 2.1 0.5
GESFIDE 2.7 2.4 0.4 3.7 1.6 0.4
GESFIDE with R2 correction 3.0 2.6 0.6 3.5 1.8 0.6
GESSE 2.7 2.5 0.3 graphic file with name nihms592280t3.jpg* 2.3 1.8 0.2 graphic file with name nihms592280t4.jpg*
GESSE with R2 correction 3.5 3.0 0.7 2.8 2.1 0.3
*

indicates statistical significance (p<0.008) using the Wilcoxon ranked sum test.