Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 1;35(2):197–209. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3080-5

Table 1.

Profile of clinical trials on etanercept biosimilars according to international regulations

Sponsor Biosimilar Condition Phase Estimated recruitment Experimental design Dose (mg) Parameter References
Samsung Bioepis SB4 RA (−+) III 498 SB4 versus etanercept 50 S, E NIH [113]
Samsung Bioepis SB4 Healthy I 138 SB4 versus etanercept (EU) and etanercept (US) 50 PK, S, I NIH [114]
Sandoz GP2015 Ps III 372 GP2015 versus etanercept 50 E NIH [115]
TSH Biopharm Corporation TuNEX®/ENIA11 RA, MX III 129 TuNEX® versus MTX and Placebo 15–25 S, E, I Gu et al. [91], Chen et al. [116]
LG Life Sciences LBEC0101 Healthy I 36 LBEC0101 versus etanercept 25 PK NIH [117]
Daewoong Pharmaceutical DWP422 RA I 38 DWP422 versus etanercept 25 PK, S NIH [118]
Hanwha Chemical HD203 Healthy I 44 HD203 versus etanercept 25 PK [90]
Coherus Biosciences Inc/Baxter and Daiichi Sankyo CHS-0214 Healthy I CHS-0214 versus etanercept PK Yi et al. [119]
Bionovis (Merck Serono) 318 unknown versus etanercept E Scaramuzzo [92], Brazilian Ministry of Health [93]

Pk pharmacokinetic, MTX methotrexate, RA (−+) moderate and severe rheumatoid arthritis, S safety, E efficacy, I immunogenicity