Table 3.
Miller indices (hkl) | d (Å) | 2θCuKα(°) | 2θCoKα(°) |
---|---|---|---|
(001)a | 8.0 | 11.1 | 12.8 |
(100) | 4.62 | 19.2 | 22.3 |
(002) | 4.0 | 22.2 | 25.8 |
(110) | 2.67 | 33.6 | 39.2 |
(111) | 2.5 | 35.5 | 41.4 |
(200) | 2.31 | 39.0 | 45.6 |
(004) | 2.0 | 45.3 | 53.1 |
(210) | 1.75 | 52.4 | 61.6 |
(301) | 1.5 | 61.3 | 72.5 |
aWe have used the unit cell definition and Miller indices reported by Bode et al. and McEwen, in which the intersheet distance, dIS=c[4,28]. However, some authors use a different unit cell definition, such that dIS=c/3 (e.g. [33,34]). In these sources, the Miller indices also vary by a factor of three (e.g. where we report (001), they would report (003), etc.).