Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 8;471(2174):20140792. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0792

Table 3.

X-ray diffraction parameters of α-Ni(OH)2 calculated using the unit cell shown in figure 4 and the lattice parameters reported by Pandya et al. [32]. Fewer significant digits are provided for peaks involving the crystallographic c-axis [(001), (111), etc.]. Diffraction angles are listed for Cu Kα (λ=1.542 Å) and Co Kα (λ=1.789 Å) X-ray sources.

Miller indices (hkl) d (Å) 2θCuKα(°) 2θCoKα(°)
(001)a 8.0 11.1 12.8
(100) 4.62 19.2 22.3
(002) 4.0 22.2 25.8
(110) 2.67 33.6 39.2
(111) 2.5 35.5 41.4
(200) 2.31 39.0 45.6
(004) 2.0 45.3 53.1
(210) 1.75 52.4 61.6
(301) 1.5 61.3 72.5

aWe have used the unit cell definition and Miller indices reported by Bode et al. and McEwen, in which the intersheet distance, dIS=c[4,28]. However, some authors use a different unit cell definition, such that dIS=c/3 (e.g. [33,34]). In these sources, the Miller indices also vary by a factor of three (e.g. where we report (001), they would report (003), etc.).