Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;10(1):e0114571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114571

Table 4. Effect of Ca on total protein content and proline content in leaves of mustard plants under Cd stress.

Treatments Total protein content(mg g−l FW) Proline content(μg g−l FW)
30DAT 60DAT 90DAT 30DAT 60DAT 90DAT
S0 6.02±0.60a$ 8.5±0.79a£ 10.7±1.02a¥ 51±2.51a$ 54±2.55a£ 55±2.56a¥
S1 6.5±0.68b$ 9.1±0.86b£ 11.2±1.12b¥ 51.2±2.51a$ 54.4±2.56a£ 55.2±2.57a¥
S2 4.57±0.48c$ 6.2±0.65c£ 7.3±0.70c¥ 93±2.87b$ 125±3.31b£ 159±4.05b¥
S3 5.1±0.53d$ 6.7±0.68d£ 8.0±0.74d¥ 107±3.1c$ 132±3.36c£ 167±4.20c¥
S4 3.43±0.33e$ 4.8±0.50e£ 5.9±0.61e¥ 115±3.3d$ 143±3.49d£ 187±4.33d¥
S5 4.0±0.42f$ 5.4±0.57f£ 6.5±0.67f¥ 130±3.6e$ 153±3.91e£ 194±4.58e¥

Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters next to the number indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among the treatments within a developmental stage. Symbols $, £ and ¥ denote significant change among the different developmental stages in the same treatment. S0 = Control, S1 = Cd (0 mg L−1) + Ca (50 mM), S2 = Cd (200 mg L−1), S3 = Cd (200 mg L−1) + Ca (50 mM), S4 = Cd (300 mg L−1), S5 = Cd (300 mg L−1) + Ca (50 mM). DAT, days after treatment; FW, fresh weight.