Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;10(1):e0115805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115805

Table 4. Comparasion of three types of motifs for EST-SSR in all the five species.

Motif Cicer arietium Lotus corniculatus Medicago sativa Medicago truncatula Caragana korshinskii
A/T 5445(75)* 2126(46.5) 442(47.1) 9061(70.5) 11150(58.22)
C/G 1052(14.5) 138(3.02) 8(0.85) 785(5.23) 322(1.68)
AG/CT 216(3) 575(12.6) 119(12.7) 1766(17.8) 2584(13.5)
AT/AT 108(1.5) 204(4.5) 19(2.0) 468(3.1) 460(2.4)
AC/GT 30(0.4) 112(2.5) 31(3.3) 201(1.3) 873(4.6)
CG/CG 3(0.04) 2(0.04) - 31(0.2) 7(0.04)
AAG/CTT 96(1.4) 414(9.1) 97(10.3) 851(5.7) 1035(5.4)
AAC/GTT 55(0.8) 143(3.1) 40(4.3) 313(2.1) 619(3.2)
AAT/ATT 69(0.95) 49(1.1) 23(2.5) 297(2.0) 360(1.9)
ACC/GGT 47(0.6) 246(5.4) 39(4.2) 211(1.4) 326(1.7)
ACG/CGT 4(0.06) 16(0.4) 2(0.2) 35(0.2) 40(0.2)
ACT/AGT 9(0.1) 32(0.7) 2(0.2) 74(0.5) 114(0.6)
AGC/CTG 15(0.2) 79(1.7) 26(2.8) 141(0.9) 181(0.9)
AGG/CCT 16(0.2) 119(2.6) 12(1.3) 119(0.8) 295(1.5)
ATC/ATG 59(0.8) 166(3.6) 43(4.6) 391(2.6) 395(2.1)
CCG/CGG 4(0.06) 44(1.0) 1(0.1) 18(0.1) 68(0.4)

*: The numbers in the bracket showed the percentage of the specific SSR motif type.