Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 4;18(1):50–64. doi: 10.1111/desc.12178

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The error rates for object recognition and part integration before (in gray) and 4 years after the training ended (post-training, in blue). (A) LG's error rates in the Birmingham Object Recognition Battery overlapping figures task (test 6) were reduced following training only for letters (NB: LG's error rate on the pretest for simple geometric patterns was 0%). (B) LG's Hooper visual organization error rates dropped to nearly half following training (from 58% pre-training to 33% post-training). (C) LG's naming accuracy for intact or occluded line drawings of animals. His performance on the occluded animals might indicate mild improvement.