Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 27;6:10.3402/ejpt.v6.25178. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.25178

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study participants according to their apolipoprotein ε-4 (APOE-ε4) carrier status

Non-carriers (N=116) Carriers (N=21) Total Test statisticsa Effect sizea p a
Gender, female, n (%) 69 (59.5) 13 (61.9) 82 (59.9) 0.04b 0.02c 0.835
Age (years), mean (SD) 59.01 (6.00) 60.38 (6.73) 59.22 (6.11) −0.95d −0.21e 0.346
Educational years, mean (SD) 12.30 (4.10) 11.33 (4.04) 12.15 (4.10) 0.99c 0.24e 0.323
Marital status 0.46b 0.06d 0.550
Married 92 (79.3) 18 (85.7) 110 (80.3)
Widowed/divorced/separated 24 (20.7) 3 (14.3) 27 (19.7)
Employment 0.36b 0.05d 0.547
Employed 58 (50.0) 9 (42.9) 67 (48.9)
Unemployed 58 (50.0) 12 (57.1) 70 (51.1)
Apolipoprotein genotype, n NA NA NA
ε2/ε3 16 0 16
ε3/ε3 100 0 100
ε3/ε4 0 21 21
ACE score (0–10) 1.16 (2.23) 1.86 (2.99) 1.26 (2.36) 0.99c −0.04e 0.323
QIDS-SR score (0–27) 7.17 (5.07) 8.71 (5.43) 7.41 (5.15) −1.27c −0.29e 0.207

NA=not applicable; ACE=adverse childhood experiences; QIDS-SR=Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rating.

a

Comparison between non-carriers and carriers.

b

Chi-square test analysis.

c

Φ analysis.

d

t-statistics analysis.

e

Cohen's d analysis.