Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 27;6:10.3402/ejpt.v6.25178. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.25178

Table 2.

Results of multiple linear regression models exploring the effect of childhood adversity and an apolipoprotein-ε4 (APOE-ε4) carrier status on depressive symptoms

B (95% CI) SE t p
Model 1: Overall
 Intercept −0.04 (−11.01, 10.92) 5.54 −0.01 0.994
 ACE scores 0.54 (0.20, 0.88) 0.17 3.14 0.002
 APOE-ε4 carrier status (for ACE=0) 1.55 (−0.54, 3.64) 1.06 1.46 0.145
Model 2
 Non-carrier
  Intercept 1.37 (−9.50, 12.23) 5.49 0.25 0.804
  ACE scores 0.32 (−0.07, 0.71) 0.20 1.63 0.107
 Carrier
  Intercept 1.56 (−9.42, 12.54) 5.55 0.28 0.779
  ACE scores 1.17 (0.52, 1.82) 0.33 3.56 0.001
  APOE-ε4 carrier status (for ACE=0) 0.19 (−2.19, 2.58) 1.21 0.16 0.874
  ACE×APOE-ε4 0.85 (0.10, 1.61) 0.38 2.24 0.027

B=unstandardized regression coefficient; CI=confidence interval; SE=standard error; ACE=adverse childhood experiences.

Independent variables are displayed in the first column and the dependent variables are the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rating (QIDS-SR) scores. Model 1 includes sex, age, educational years, marital and occupational status, ACE scores, and APOE-ε4 carrier status as independent variables; Model 2 includes an ACE×APOE-ε4 interaction term in addition to the variables in model 1. The intercept is the value when all the adjustment variables have a value of 0 (i.e., sex=male, age=0 year, educational years=0, marital status=married, occupational status=employed).

F=7.50, p<0.001, and R2=0.28 in Model 1, and F=7.43, p<0.001, and R2=0.30 in Model 2.

The proportions of floor and ceiling values were 58.4 and 0% for ACE and 3.6 and 0% for QIDS-SR.