Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;70(2):187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.09.003

Table 1.

Timing and intensity of influenza transmission in the cohort.

Period Year (months) seasona Subtype Strainb % infected(95% CI)c
Pre-study 2007 H1N1 Solomon Islands/3/06-like
2007 H3N2 Brisbane/10/2007-like
2007 B Yamagata Florida/04/2006-like
Bleed 1 2007 (12) Winter
Season 1 2008 (7–8) Summer H1N1 Brisbane/59/2007-like 7.2 (5.3–9.7)
2008 (8–9) Autumn H3N2 Brisbane/10/2007-like 2.3 (1.3–4.0)
2008 (2,4,6,9,10,12) B Yamagata Florida/04/2006-liked,e 12.6 (10.1–15.6)
Bleed 2 2008 (12) Winter
Season 2 2009 (4) Spring H1N1 Brisbane/59/2007-like 8.6 (6.6–11.0)
2009 (4–6) Spring H3N2 Perth/16/2009-like 13.1 (10.7–16.0)
2009 (4) Spring B Victoria Cambodia/30/2011-likee 10.5 (8.3–13.1)
Bleed 3 2009 (6) Summer
Season 3 2009 (9–12) Autumn H1N1 California/04/2009-like 18.2 (15.3–21.5)
Bleed 4 2010 (4) Spring
a

Months (January = 1 – December = 12) when influenza virus RNA was detected in swabs by RT-PCR.

b

Strain designation is based on National Influenza Surveillance programme data from Northern Vietnam coordinated by the National Influenza Center at the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology. Strains considered to be antigenically distinct compared to those circulating previously are shown in bold.

c

The number of participants assessed is shown in Table 2.

d

This strain started to circulate just prior to study commencement and continued to circulate during the study.

e

Six influenza B strains were isolated in S1 and belonged to the Yamagata lineage whereas a single strain was isolated in S2 and belonged to the Victoria lineage (Table S1).