Table 6.
Rating of the consistency between available evidence and decisions
| Public sector | Private sector | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donors (n = 3) | MoH (n = 6) | MoF (n = 1) | Service providers and managers at district level (n = 6) | CSOs (n = 4) | Researchers (n = 2) | Service provider PNFP (n = 3) | Total | ||
| Agenda setting | Strong (1) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Moderate (2) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Weak (3) | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |||||
| No influence (4) | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Analytical stage | Strong (1) | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Moderate (2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Weak (3) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| No influence (4) | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Decision making | Strong (1) | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| Moderate (2) | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Weak (3) | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | ||||
| No influence (4) | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Implementation | Strong (1) | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Moderate (2) | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Weak (3) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | ||
| No influence (4) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | ||||
Service providers could only rank at the policy implementation stage.
MoH: two were not able to rank and were excluded from this analysis.
Service providers: three were not able to rank and were excluded from this analysis.