Table 5.
Comparison of miPlantPre against other methods
| Methods | Training dataset | Testing dataset | Features selected | Classification results (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pos | neg | pos | neg | SE | SP | Acc | Gm | ||
| Triplet-SVM | 163 | 168 | 30 | 1000 | 32 | 93.30 | 88.10 | 90.66 | 90.66 |
| MiPred | 163 | 168 | 263 | 265 | 34 | 89.35 | 93.21 | 91.26 | 91.26 |
| miPred | 200 | 400 | 123 | 146 | 34 | 84.55 | 97.97 | 91.01 | 91.01 |
| miRabela | Not given clearly in the article | 71.00 | 97.00 | 82.99 | 82.99 | ||||
| microPred | SMOTE + outer-5-fold-cv | 21 | 90.02 | 97.28 | 93.58 | 93.58 | |||
| plantMiRNAPred | outer-5-fold-cv | 68 | 91.93 | 97.84 | 94.84 | 94.84 | |||
| miPlantPre | outer-5-fold-cv | 47 | 95.50 | 98.82 | 97.16 | 97.16 | |||