Table 1.
2007 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Mean | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | 60DAH | 120DAH | H | 60DAH | 120DAH | H | 60DAH | 120DAH | H | 60DAH | 120DAH | 120 DAH | |
M16 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
M20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
M49 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
M40 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.8 |
M48 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.6 |
M74 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Scores range from 1 (no mealiness perception) to 5 (very high mealiness perception). Evaluations were carried out during four years (2007 and from 2009 to 2011) at three time points (H: harvest, 60 and 120 DAH: i.e. 2 and 4 months of storage in a cold chamber at 1°C). “Mean 120 DAH” is the mean of the four years for the last time point. Mealy hybrids are highlighted in grey.